Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Camera Shoot

"In the near future, a soldier who needs a quick look over the next hill will be able to aim his rifle skyward, fire a grenade-sized reconnaissance device and instantly receive imagery on his pocket computer," writes Defense News' Barbara Opall-Rome.

firefly.jpg"No special training or adaptation equipment is necessary" to fire the Firefly, from Israel's Rafael Armament Development Authority, or Israel Military Industry's Reconnaissance Rifle Grenade.

Grunts just fire the disposable "ballistic cameras" from "standard-issue M203 grenade launchers attached to M16 or other assault rifles," and then wait for the pictures to come back, 8 seconds and 600 meters later.

In this way, the ballisitc cameras a lot like the pint-sized drones which have become so popular among American company commanders in Iraq.

In 2002, the U.S. Army had 25 year-long Raven unmanned mini-planes; today, company and platoon chiefs are using about 800 in combat.

"Why the boom?" I asked in Wired a few months back.

Eyes in the sky keep soldiers from getting killed. "The way you used to get intel on the battlefield was you fought for it, sending your squad into a building, forcing your way in," says former Army captain Phillip Carter. Now company commanders can see around corners and over hills - a God's-eye perspective that once was the domain of generals, with their Predators, manned spy planes, and satellites.

The Ravens are simple to use -- one of the best-known operators is a cook. But, with no guidance system to operate, the ballistic cameras would be easier still: "point and shoot," to use a cliche. Which means the ability to see a battlezone from above could shift from a general to a captain to a buck private, rifle in hand.

Latest Comments

I think it should be rechargeable and reusable, so little kids can play with them. In most of the battle zones where we send US troops, a lot of homes are flattened by grenades, mortars, etc. So, let kids play with the cool little drones.

Posted by: jimbo92107 at September 14, 2005 3:19 AM


This seems like a huge waste of time/money. the average grunt will never use one his commander will say they are just to expencive to use and with budget cuts and all and by the time you shoot round. the pic gets back 8 sec later and your commander's aid gets the info from intel whom then "advises" your commanders aid who give the info to the commander(and gets it all wrong) who then radios the gunny who then tells the cpl who .. wait 2 days have passed and every thing has changed. Where this is good is a quick over shoot of the enemies base.. wait we use sat's for that Nvm. Yea these are a brilliant piece of junk and good for the kids to play with.

Posted by: Raven at August 7, 2005 10:52 PM


So, the "basic grunt" now will have to carry a PDA with screen big enough to watch the images, (gprs attached so he can send data to fire support units) Medtech? Yup. Water, food, ammo, a small tent... HUD in the helmet, ceramic plates in the west, cameras on rifles, cameras in grenades, Radio, cables, batteries, TAG gear? Yeah those too... laser-sights and "pointers"... and a 16 wheeler to carry all this stuff while he fights.

The "wired" soldier concept is getting way too sophiasticated for actual combat.

Then comes a guy with minimum armor and a good old AK and ruins your day.

Still it can be a good add-on... but not for a line soldier. You WILL need training, not to use the device, but in small units tactics, as what to use FOR. Old infantry teams had grunts, a heavy gunner (MG), an anti armor guy, and a medtech.

As precision missiles and TAG technology improves, you need no anti-tank gear...just a laser and a radio to call the suport fire. So you can switch this guy for the above mentioned operator... (or even an ECM-ECCM soldier if the trend escalates so fast.)

Posted by: Kevin at August 5, 2005 3:56 AM


I've worked with Predators and other UAVs. The real problem with the smaller UAVs is that the operator (a) has to have some training (even if it's just the basics of RC flight control) and (b) has to have a reasonable safe area of cover to operate from. This device negates the need for both of those. The operator will already have training on how to fire the weapon for range and target. The operator can also fire this in the middle of battle, and then retreat to cover to analyze the resulting images. Great example is a group of operators pinned behind cover that need to see who's firing at them (ie where are they and how many, what cover are they behind). They lay down temporary cover fire while one operator steps out, fires this device and then retreats back to cover. They then receive images of the battlefield and the locations of their targets. Great device.

Posted by: DJ at August 4, 2005 12:29 PM


I reckon RC (remote controlled) choppers or devices such as the X-UFO should be perfected, made cheaper and smaller...then fitted with cameras. That way the military will have reusable, accurate and reliable means of retrieving surveillance info quickly and easily. The X-UFO for instance can move the same way a chopper can, but is quieter and easier to control.

Posted by: eujinn at August 3, 2005 8:45 PM


» View All 8 Comments

» Post a Comment