Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Giant Blimp on the Rise

The idea is pretty wild, even for the dreamers at Darpa: build a giant blimp that can haul 1,800 soldiers and their gear 12,000 nautical miles, in less than a week.

wired_blimp.jpgBut the Pentagon's research arm is serious enough about the project, code-named Walrus, to hand out more than $6 million to Lockheed Martin and Aeros Aeronautical Group to start designing the thing.

The Defense Department has renewed its interest in blimps in recent years; a pair of tethered airships kept watch over the giant American military complex near the Baghdad airport, when I was there. The "tri-phibian" (air, land, sea) Walrus is particularly intriguing because the Pentagon is trying to figure out ways to make American forces less reliant on deep-water ports, foreign bases, and billion-dollar airports to wage war. The Army's Surface Deployment and Distribution Command has its own plans for a such an airship.

Darpa hopes the designs they've just funded will lead to a small-scale Walrus, capable of carting 30 tons, by 2008, Defense Industry Daily notes. That's as much as today's C-130 transport planes. But it's only a fraction of the million pounds that the agency wants the Walrus will ultimately be able to lug around.

(Illustration by John MacNeill, used with premission.)

Latest Comments

I worked on this project for one of these companies, of course Walrus was cancelled last month for lack of interest and therefore money in Congress. First of all this is a hybrid craft, it's not an airship or an airplane, it is heavier than air but gets partial lift from the Helium gas cells for Up/Down operations and gets the forward velocity from engines via dynamic lift(wing). The biggest problem with this whole concept is that people think it's crazy, I mean could you imagine something as big as an aircraft carrier or the Titanic flying through the air with 500 tonnes of men/equipment, it's a hard sell that didn't.

Posted by: Walrus Engineer at May 13, 2006 3:43 AM


1) I'd like to see these used for fighting wildfires out west. Five or six of these units custom-fitted with sprinkler lines (making it look more like a daddy-longlegs than a walrus) can surround an area and lay down a steady drizzle/downpour until the blaze burns itself out. It seems to me that a few thousand tons of water concentrated over the firezone could last a weekend or more.

2) This whole idea reminds me of Bucky Fuller's theoretical Clond Nines: http://www.jerrypournelle.com/archives2/archives2mail/mail311.html#Nine

Posted by: Ed at February 1, 2006 5:02 AM


My company has been working on this blimp technology for years. Solid Fuel Rocket Blimps. Live or die, I'll make a million!

Posted by: Richard Anderson, Holistic Forge Works at November 22, 2005 9:06 PM


Here's the DID in-depth profile link for the Walrus Program:

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/10/walrus-heavylift-blimp-getting-off-the-ground/index.php

And here's a good "kick-start an industry" example:

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2005/05/ssc-developing-multiple-uses-for-airbeam-technology/index.php

Lots of uses for confined gas these days. A natural idea, I guess, being in Washington....

Posted by: Joe Katzman at October 21, 2005 8:26 AM


Lockheed won because the bidder was the Lockheed Skunk Works (ADP), who developed the U-2, SR-71, et. al. There isn't a more respected name in aviation anywhere in the world if you're going for a breakthrough, and DARPA is.

Aeros must have had a very good proposal to be the #2.

Defense Industry Daily's in-depth profile on the Walrus project includes a note re: Milennium Airships, which may have lost the bid but could definitely remain involved in the project.

Finally, I'm really sorry SkyCat didn't win because they seem to have a very good grasp of the civilian end, and civilian HULA production would help in a number of ways. I hope they go on to succeed in the civil market, and pick up some military contracts for border surveillance SkyCat-20s as well.

Long term, I think the US Army would be wise to think about kick-starting an industry here. Wouldn't be the first time - not even for inflatables...

Posted by: Joe Katzman at October 21, 2005 8:24 AM


» View All 16 Comments

» Post a Comment