Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Back in the 1940's, scientists suggested that a plane with uneven, or oblique, wings might be the best shape for supersonic travel. Sixty years later, no one has been able to make a working, Mach-speed model. Now, the Pentagon's fringe-science arm, Darpa, not only wants to take a whack at the decades-old problem -- the agency is looking for a plane that's one giant, cockeyed wing.

flying_wing.JPGOblique wings, in theory, provide more lift and less drag than standard aircrafts. But engineers haven't figured out how to build a plane that could handle the "aerodynamic control, aero-structural design, and propulsion integration" that come with the asymmetric approach, Darpa says. There's not even enough "data to date to assess the feasibility" for a supersonic oblique flying wing [OFW] design, the agency notes.

In its new "Switchblade" program, Darpa is aiming to "demonstrate the feasibility and controllability of a supersonic, tailless, variable sweep OFW concept; validate the design methods and control approaches for the design; and facilitate consideration of an OFW planform in the design of potential future operational aircraft."

To start, Darpa wants a good set of OFW plans. They'll have to include:

• Non-expendable aircraft with a wheeled, retractable undercarriage for take-off and landing

• Air breathing propulsion

• Supersonic demonstration at a Mach number greater than or equal to 1.2

• Tailless configuration in supersonic cruise and subsonic loiter conditions

• Variable wing sweep demonstrated in-flight from a minimum wing sweep of not more than 30 degrees to a maximum wing sweep of not less than 60 degrees

• Aspect ratio greater than or equal to 7 at the minimum sweep condition

• Wingspan greater than or equal to 40 feet at the minimum sweep condition.

Darpa isn't exactly sure what an OFW craft would do, if it ever got built. But the agency has some ideas about the kind of tasks a flying wing could handle. Maybe the OFW would spy on targets 2,500 miles away, loitering in the air for 15 hours at a time. Or maybe the plane could become a Mach 2 bomber, dumping 15,000 pounds of ordnance on unsuspecting foes, wondering what the hell that strange thing was, flying overhead.

THERE'S MORE: In the comments, Giovanni links to some of NASA's oblique wing attempts. And Murc points us to Northrop's response to the "Switchblade" chalenge.

Latest Comments

And now we have a first flight date in 2010 !

BR

Posted by: Ben R. at April 3, 2006 12:26 PM


sure will be pretty seeing one fly along... and then it will tumble gently down to earth as if falls out of the sky plumeting into a huge fireball. :(
Lets hope they do all the flight testing with remote control. this looks like a death trap.

Posted by: Aaron at October 19, 2005 9:41 PM


Heres Northrop Grummans concept pic, they think they could have it built by 2020.
They probably have the best shot, since they built the B-2 bomber, so they have experience with a tailess flying wing.

http://www.flightinternational.com/Articles/2005/09/27/Navigation/250/201775/Northrop+responds+to+US+Switchblade+challenge.html

Posted by: Murc at October 18, 2005 1:05 AM


AD1 here we go:

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/AD-1/HTML/index.html

Posted by: giovanni at October 18, 2005 12:12 AM


Back in 79-82 is when Nasa had one...Called the AD-1 Oblique Wing, its wing turned up to a 60 degree angle.

But this would be much harder to build. Since this would have its engines internal, and would have to go supersonic, be unmanned, and have a well engineered thrust vectoring system.

Posted by: Murc at October 17, 2005 11:46 PM


» View All 7 Comments

» Post a Comment