Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Upgrade for IED Task Force?

Guys in uniform bitch a lot. Especially when two military groups are tackling related jobs. Handling bombs is no different. The Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) guys think the engineers are constantly interfering in their work. The engineers say the EOD dudes are snobby and too secret squirrel for their own good.

small_talon_screen.jpgBut, around Baghdad at least, the group causing the most friction seems to be the Pentagon's "Joint IED Defeat Task Force." While EOD techs have to scrounge around to buy their own belts, the Task Force has a billion dollar budget. And while bomb squadders spend a year in training, I saw completely green members of the Task Force wandering around bomb sites, picking stuff up at random. The engineers and the EOD techs took bets on whether or not they'd survive their tours of duty.

Not that the Task Force folks had much nice to say about the bomb squads. "EOD has it pretty easy," one member told me.

For most soldiers in Iraq, the Task Force's main contribution was "5-and-25." It's a mantra which means that soldiers should check 5 meters around their vehicles when they first get out, and then do a 25 meter sweep after that.

Behind the scenes, and back in the States, the Task Force is also doing a bunch of technology development to try and slow down the seemingly-endless waves of improvised bombs hitting American forces. Several Task Force members have compared the effort to the Manhattan Project. But with the number of explosives on the rise, there's grumbling in Washington that the Task Force doesnt have the juice or the budget to justify the comparison, the L.A. Times notes. There's talk of replacing the Task Force, currently headed by a one-star general, with a new group that would have "an active-duty three-star general or admiral, or a retired four-star officer."

Some military officials complain that the Pentagon has made little progress in getting the White House to pressure agencies such as the CIA, FBI and Department of Energy to devote more resources and full-time personnel to the anti-IED effort. One difficulty they cite is that a one-star general tends to wield little influence in the government hierarchy.

"It's just amazing how long it takes for the bureaucracy to seriously tackle an issue, when some things should happen lickety-split," said a second senior Defense official.

THERE'S MORE: It's Friday, and I'm feeling punchy and reckless. So here's a pic of me trying to handle an IED leftover.

Latest Comments

Thomas Renteria, email me on AKO @ christopher.field and I will help you. have some good contacts and access that you can benefit from.

Posted by: C Field at January 28, 2007 1:09 AM


I am currently serving in Iraq and over the course of the last couple days my life has been saved by army equipment twice, and the Duke being one of the devices that saved my life and the lives of everyone in the vehicle, my question for anyone that may know the answer to is ,how do I go about finding the dash 10 or maintenance manual on this device so that we can properly maintain it?

Posted by: Thomas Renteria at January 26, 2007 4:01 PM


I agree on the security issue with posting to much info. But look at the original post. ELECTRONIC ENGINEER! Can you say insurgent fishing for info. If he was an electrical engineer don't you think he could spell! Insurgents open source everything on the internet. Beware. Noah don't let your journalism interfer with integrity!

Posted by: Ben at January 7, 2007 9:29 PM


I am electronic engineer, I have designed and built a prototype of electronic jammer against IED device. I make the full demo in SAn Diego end of March 2006.The demo was fully success with using the Cellphone SN920 ENGENIUS as detonator.This Cellphone has 1Watt output and 200 hope per second, not easy to jam. We dont need high power jammer only 250mW and some other innovative design. I can explain to you how it's works, but most important it's that nothing happen after this demo, because the company located in Virginia Beach "AMT..." dont care about the boys in Iraq, they have some other interest.....

Posted by: Gerard at November 22, 2006 10:56 AM


As a recently retired Navy Master Chief of 30 years and EOD Tech for the last 20 of those 30 years, I would just like to point out, as did another individual that, although nothing classified is posted in the comments, a LOT of useful information could possibly be gleaned from some of these comments by our enemies. I would just like to ask that those who make comments, and those who screen and post them think about what information they could unwittingly be giving to the enemy that can be used against us. Since my early days in EOD in the mid-80's until now, I have always been of the mind that we are too free with information. Some may accuse EOD of being "secret squirrel" but I believe we should not advertise our capabilities and limitations. More than ever, this is an "EOD" war and I think too many individuals have gotten caught up in a desire to be cool and look cool and advertise coolness instead of quietly doing our job and not showing the world how we do it so counter measures can be formulated. Thanks for the opportunity to have my say....

Posted by: William Tyrrell at October 12, 2006 3:47 PM


» View All 23 Comments

» Post a Comment