Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Troops Get New Jammers

One of the few reliable methods the U.S. military has for stopping improvised bombs are radio frequency jammers, which stop the bombs from being remotely triggered.

humvee_ice.jpgI've mentioned the jammers -- specifically, the Warlock family of jammers -- a whole bunch of times on the site. But there are others, too. Raytheon, for example, just got another $15.5 million for its IED Countermeasure Equipment ("ICE") systems. If I'm doing the math right -- always a questionable proposition -- that means another 1200-1300 jammers for the troops.

Back in April, Copley News Service notes, Lt. Gen. James Mattis told Congress that "the Marines are sending 1,066 of the new devices to Iraq and plan to buy another 2,500. The Army is purchasing 3,000." In August, the Joint IED Defeat Task Force shifted "$48 million to buy 6,246 [ICE] kits," according to Inside the Army.

"The device is about the size of a large gym bag," the El Paso Times noted in August.

It is a rectangular metal box with switches, fans and connectors on its face and sides. It takes about 15 minutes to install in a vehicle and it runs off the vehicle's power system.... The ICE device can be programmed from a laptop in the field, and it was designed with space inside the chassis for new equipment. The electronics are modular and easily replaced in the field. The simple design also makes it relatively cheap to manufacture.

Really cheap. "At $12,000 each, [ICE] is one-third the price of the Warlock device," Copley notes. Which is one reason so many are being sent into the field.

But while the jammers are useful tools, they can't guarantee soldiers and marines' safety. Far from it.

In a little more than a month, at least three marine bomb squad members have been killed by IEDs -- a huge loss for a community that's only a few hundred people big. It's safe to assume that all three had some sort of jammer. But the bombs that killed them, I'm told, were triggered by motion-detectors. No radio frequency jammer in the world could have stopped them from going off.

Latest Comments

stop posting this shit....you are only hurting your fellow soldiers when you talk about stuff that should be (and probably is) classified. We all know what works and doesn't work...why share that info with the enemy?!!?!?!?!?!?

Posted by: george at December 16, 2006 10:39 AM


You can swamp the passive IR detectors if you hit them with enough IR. It may be possible to send out pulses which cause them to detonate. There are other methods that do need countermeasures.

Wired system. A man with a clacker and some wire. There's a 'lightning' device that can kill those fairly well from the documents.

Others that should be jamable:
Passive IR
Active IR trip wire
Remote IR signalling
Active laser trip wire
Remote laser signalling

These do need discussed openly so that a wide variety of people can determine a means of thwarting each type of device. There are so many ways to signal a detonation no single person can catalog all of them.


Posted by: Mr Meval at November 2, 2006 5:41 PM


Why construct such senseless things like "Love robots" when it is possible to change humans into robots themselves by operate conditioning and brainstorming at it has been done in the past by some spy organisations with what the russians called "Telephone" ?

The conveniant may be to hinder this, but one never knows, wether the robot will turn against his inventor, when to "off" button is missing in the construction in case of emergency.

In the history of robots there not only one case a robot killed his inventor who failed this emergency facility.

The story of Heel 2000 in the movie "2001" is not a fiction, i do believe, since mankind seems to be endangered to be ruled by machines made by his own invention creating "cyber-worlds" like "SIM-Life" an others ...

Even the internet is not free of this, since i had the experience, that some enterprises were capable to copy and falsify any WEB-side, just to make one believe you are in the real one.

For instance my wife, from whom i was devorced, i can admire as a cyberwoman in official sites of german government and our child to seems to have become a "Data corpse, whose real existance is still not proved.

Think also to the real "Diana Spencer" story : What will prove, that is was not a dummy killed in that car or a double that was elected in a multimaedia beauty-competition to save the life of the real one.

Windsor are cable of that, thinking anyone in England to be a simple subject and not a free human beeing.

Thus as the story of doubles in history is not new, it has become more finer in its apearance :

Bin Laden for instance may be a press invention as there had been about fifty Hitlers during WW II or fife Schröders, making their appearance in more then one place simultanesly !

Even the person of George W.Bush may be a double, or a speaking dummy, when making its statements
on presidents briefings.

Scince medicine evoqued a pope as cybernatic man-machine one never nows if, what ever You meet in the neighbourhood is a real human beeing or a conditioned Zombie.

So better take care of what Yoiu believe from media presentation an cybernatic virtual reality ...

The Aliens are amongst us !

Posted by: Dr.Soehring at May 20, 2006 1:11 PM


Duct tape, duct tape the local mullah to the front of the patrol vehicle, that should diminish the IED activity.

Posted by: Smitty at December 15, 2005 10:59 PM


thanks to who ever wrote this for informing the enemy of our latest technology. DOD just had a class on not posting information to the net that might help terrorists. please think about what you post and how it may help the enemy before you post it.
many thanks for your help in this
j

Posted by: j at December 5, 2005 10:23 AM


» View All 13 Comments

» Post a Comment