Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

The Muftis of Kurdistan

Here's the second of David Axe's dispatches from the electioneering in northern Iraq.

Kurds have become relentless self-promoters, pitching for aid and recognition with characteristic unity. But two brothers, Adnan and Kanan Mufti, play the public relations game a whole lot better than most.

adnan_mufti_1215.JPGKanan Mufti is the Kurdistan Director of Archeology and a member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party. He's also an unofficial ambassador of Kurdistan. He receives journalists, academics and foreign dignitaries in his well-appointed two-story home in Erbil. Listen to what he told me on Dec. 14: “The Kurdish people is the only people in the Middle East with respect for other nations. We used to cohabitate in a brotherly fashion with Jews. Now we have the district of Ankawa populated by Christians. Kurds have been oppressed, but they oppress no one.

You might wonder where this is going. After a drag on his cigarette and a sip of chai, he asked off-handedly why Kurdistan, with such a great human rights record, couldn't have independence.

Because it would tear Iraq apart and invite a Turkish invasion, is why. But Kanan's not the only person wondering. Kurds everywhere dream of independence, consequences be damned.

Kanan's brother Adnan is a big wig in the rival Kurdish political party, the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan. He's currently speaker of the regional assembly.

Adnan Mufti isn't as blunt as Kanan. Taking a break from a press conference with local journalists on election day, he tells me that the elections are important because they will mean a new government and new laws that will reinvigorate the U.S.-Iraqi partnership. “To struggle together against terrorists and terrorism and to have a new Iraq federation respecting human rights … that’s why our people suffered, to have this one day.”

In my experience, “human rights” is Kurdish code for “Kurdish rights”. Adnan Mufti is too clever not to couch his regional patriotism -- and his desire for more U.S. involvement in Kurdistan -- in federal Iraqi terms.

Mufti, by the way, means "powerful". You can bet that the opinions expressed by Kanan and Adnan shape those of millions of Iraqi Kurds.

-- David Axe

Comments

Nice discussion, but what has any ot this to do with "Defense Tech"?

Posted by: Deas at December 17, 2005 3:05 AM


You have to admit, the Mufti's have a very solid argument. I've yet to hear a single negative thing said about the Kurds. They seem to have fiercely independant streak that resonates well with Americans. And quite frankly, why *shouldn't* they have their own nation? Why on earth should we stick with the arbitrary national bounderies drawn after WWI and the collapse of European colonialism?

Yes, this would probably come to war. Turkey, certainly, would consider this a nightmare scenario -- they wouldn't help out in OIF out of fear of just that result. But the only thing keeping the Kurds from truely ruling themselves is just blatant appeasement. If they were to have their own state, then other nations would then lose some small section of land/wealth/power, and get pissy. As mentioned, the end result would be an offensive war to prevent it. Could you imagine if the United States had passed up declaring independance because they were afraid Britain would declare war?!?

The US had to go at it almost completely alone for their independance war. (Big ups to France for the help on that one) We are in a position to provide support to a similar Kurdish endeavor. If you believe we have a moral imperative to bring freedom to Iraqi's, there's a similar argument to be made for supporting general Kurdish freedom.


--Christopher Karel

Posted by: Christopher Karel at December 16, 2005 3:00 PM


It's been the dream of the Kurds since...well, at least the Mongol invasions. Probably around a thousand years or so. Remember the Vietnamese spent a thousand years fighting the Chinese for independence. I think they will continue to push the envelope of "federalism" and work the edges of the problem until they see their chance and make a break for it.

Many Kurds opposed the US invasion because they were afraid of losing what they had gained. Now they are much more optimistic. I'm actually sympathetic to them but there's no question that when civil war comes to Iraq, Kurdish nationalism will be one of the causes. And this is why I opposed the war: a thousand years of history were compressed into "talking points" that were thrown around by dilettantes who were only interested in Iraq as it related to Israel.

Israel got rid of Saddam but now runs the risk of combining Iraq's Shiite population with Iran's. Now that country would be an Islamic great power, though not the one Osama dreams of...he'll be back on our side if that happens.

Posted by: James at December 16, 2005 12:41 PM


» Post a Comment