Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

SEAL Ship: Silent But Deadly

CIMG0311.jpgEvery shipbuilder in the Navy these days talks about how his hulking destroyer or Cold War sub is now going to sneak SEALs onto shore. A couple of weeks back, Military.com overlord Chris Michel was down in San Diego, and saw a pretty cool new prototype ship that's been designed from scratch to handle the mission.

The 89-foot, 60-ton Stiletto will be one of the quickest ships in the fleet, using four Caterpillar C32 engines to cruise at 50 knots or more. It'll also be one of the sneakiest, according to New Scientist.

Stiletto's hull has a double-M shape that channels the wake under the craft. There it mixes with oncoming air to produce froth that lifts the ship part-way out of the water, reducing drag and increasing stability, says Greg Glaros, the programme's leader at the defence department's Office of Force Transformation.

While a crew of three runs the Stiletto, a dozen SEALs can slip off the back of the ship, in an 11-meter rigid inflatable boat -- or they can send a set of flying drones out on spy missions from the upper deck. The ship can stay on station for eight hours while the robots or the special forces are out on their operations. And the Stiletto can keep an even keel while it waits; it's cleared to operate in Sea State 5 -- waves twelve feet high and 157 feet long.

wolf_overview_4.gifIf the Stiletto works out as planned, it'll be good news for special forces. Because while every ship-maker says they've come up with the ideal commando-delivery system, several of the options haven't worked out as planned.

Take the Advanced SEAL Delivery System. "The subs were originally expected to cost $80 million each; the first one alone has cost $446 million," notes the Times-Dispatch. "The vessel was noisier than planned -- bad news for a submarine. Designs were changed to muffle the sound, and now the mini-sub vibrates too much." Which is defnitely not how commandos like to travel.

UPDATE 1:28 PM: Of course, Inside Defense had details on the ship months ago. A few:

* One reason for the unique shape is the ship was designed like an aircraft... OFT’s first director, Arthur Cebrowski, who died last month, was “very firm that we’re going to build an aircraft on the sea"... The hull has four distinct arches, which look like wings, that utilize air pressure to funnel water and glide along the surface.

* Through its “maritime data bus,” or on-board computer, the vessel will have the ability to “plug and play” with different sensors, linking with unmanned vehicles and other crafts of varying sizes, he said. With only one panel of windows for looking ahead, Stiletto will use deck cameras to give the crew a sense of what is happening around the ship.

* Production of the Stiletto prototype began in October 2004, costing $6 million in funds from OFT. Nearly the same amount has been earmarked by OFT and SOCOM combined for experimentation and testing.

UPDATE 2:37 pm: As C-Low notes in the comments, the latest issue of Defense Technology International has the Stiletto on the cover.

Latest Comments

Do they need more carbon fiber? We have 1000s of yards available!

Posted by: Johnathan Swart at January 23, 2007 5:32 PM


Great idea?! Well if Nova Scotia or Cuba get to big for their pants. The range is limiting. Maybe if it belongs to the Coasties, they could chase down smugglers. Or, like the Blue Angels they could win some poker runs with the go fast boats. As a SEAL tool? Pretty hard to be any more sneaky than jumping out of plane in the middle of the night. AMH2(AW) Hon. Disch.

Posted by: Gerry Kincheloe at October 26, 2006 1:12 PM


Guys, you need to read the fine print. This is NOT a prototype. It is more like an experiment. Anything that ends up in service will be different.

The range will increase some, but it will likely deploy from the LCS if adopted. 500 miles is what was built into this test-bed... not a limitation of the design.

The motive force will change from diesel. The company that built the thing is familiar with diesels and not familiar with turbine-driven electromotive propulsion. This would change in an operational version. Letting the company do what it was familiar with no doubt kept the cost and time to build down to a minimum.

The thing has no armament, but looks like it could carry quite a bit. Obviously that has to change.

The most amazing thing about this craft is that it was built in 6 months. That isn't bad for a one-off 80 foot boat in general, but it is phenomenal when you consider that the military was involved. (Things like this take years and years. How long did it take the Osprey to get into service?)

Posted by: Zendo Deb at August 19, 2006 10:06 PM


Well, it sounds like a pretty good project. It still needs lots of finishing touches though, like :

a) Range is quite short.
b) Diesel is not THE fuel for such ops.
c) vibs to be dealt with.
d) Sharp edges to be taken care of.

Let draughtsmen think of "KNOX type destroyers" first before they start planning on something new. Take care

Posted by: Zach P. Cotronis at March 29, 2006 6:06 PM


Is this yet another Congressional Plus-up program just to feed the needy? This boat was not built for NSW nor is it a SOCOM program of record. It is only a technology demonstrator. However, the Navy and NSW had the Norwegian ship KNM SKJOLD (www.knmskjold.org) for a year from 2001-2002 but chose to learn nothing from it. Stealth design, Composite hull etc; Shame on us for not pursuing it....

Posted by: Jerome Little at March 2, 2006 12:57 PM


» View All 66 Comments

» Post a Comment