Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Sticky Foam Gets Serious

Sticky foam is the custard pie of the nonlethals world, often seen more as a practical joke than a weapon. In fact, it worked well enough at stopping people, but suffers from some critical disadvantages, as Noah pointed out a while back.

sticky.jpgOne of the big problems is that having slimed a rioter, you can’t arrest them or take them away. And if the sticky foam covers their mouth and nose, it can be anything but non-lethal.

After some initial enthusiasm for the idea during the Marine deployment to Somalia in 1995, the idea faded and has been in limbo ever since. Now sticky foam is back, defending nuclear weapon stockpiles, according to this report from Government Security.

The report explains that some facilities storing uranium and plutonium now boast steel doors with containers of hydrocarbon solution built into them. Breach the door, and the liquid comes foaming out under high pressure, expanding in bulk by a factor of forty and sealing the breach with an impassable obstacle.

The idea is that sticky foam will delay any attackers for long enough for the defenders to call in reinforcements. Experiments with explosives found it was impossible to break through the doors without the foam barrier deploying. Another test showed how a defender could release the foam by shooting it with an M-16. According to Ronald Timm, president of RETA Security:

“If you're on the high security side of a door and attackers are attempting to break through, you can use your weapon to shoot the door…The sticky foam will deploy, delay the attackers, and give you time to call for help.”

The doors are already installed at undisclosed sites. In the new role, the foam's drawbacks become advantages. Keeping attackers stuck in place for as long as possible is helpful…and there are unlikely to be protests if any of them tries to force a way through and comes to a sticky end.

-- David Hambling

Latest Comments

I'll shed some light : why don't you take that illegal war out of Iraq? that will be the fastest way to stop getting people killed............stop creating wars without reasons

Posted by: Anonymous at March 2, 2009 5:12 PM


Mine fields aren't cleared by "sandbags" mainly because most of the devices are more sophisticated than that.

Second, because detonating them pollutes the landscape. Want your kids eating shrapnel? Howabout planting a garden in an area polluted by the reactants inside a mine? mmm poison

Posted by: Stephen Furlani at November 14, 2006 12:30 PM


Where can we get sticky foam?

Posted by: EE at August 20, 2006 2:18 AM



Setting off landmines - or any device likely to throw out shrapnel - is not a good idea if you're within 100 feet of them. You could get away with it a few times, but it's risky.

As for the pig blood idea, it sounds like a great way to boost al-Qaeda recruiting and turn everyone in the world against the US.

Posted by: Wembley at March 10, 2006 6:38 AM


You know how the sound of fingernails on a blackboard makes you feel? Or the sound of a fork dragged, tines down, across a stainless steel pan?

Couldn't those particular sound frequencies be amped up and used for crowd control? Wearing protective ear coverings wouldn't work for the bad guys, 'cuz they wouldn't be able to hear what their leaders were saying.

And while I'm here, I have a couple more thoughts along this general line of discussion:

1. I've heard that touching pig blood, or any part of a pig for that matter, is like a deadly sin to those madmen killing our GIs. Why isn't that fact, if it is a fact, used as a weapon? An explosive device that sprays pig blood instead of shrapnel, for example.

How about using squirt guns filled with pig blood for interrogations of terrorists?

2. "Humanitarian de-mining" is a big deal in many countries around the world. All the research I've seen focusses on mechanical, electrical and chemical devices and methods for finding buried anti-personnel mines. One method even tries to exploit the chemical sensitivity of bees to locate mines.

By all the accounts I've read, clearing an area of mines, once they're located, is a slow, dangerous and costly process. Extracting the mines seems to rely on variations of mechanical robots and a-brave-guy-with-a-bayonet poking around in the dirt.

My question: Once a minefield is located, why don't they just loft sandbags, old water-filled inner tubes, tires, sections of tree trunks or other round, heavy objects into the field and detonate the mines? There seems to be a definite reason for extracting the mines intact, but it's never stated.

Can anyone here shed some light on this?


Posted by: Ron at March 10, 2006 3:24 AM


» View All 16 Comments

» Post a Comment