Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Secret Spaceplane's Final Flight?

030606p1.jpgFor 16 years, Aviation Week & Space Technology says, it has been investigating a hush-hush Pentagon program to put a "small military spaceplane in orbit. Considerable evidence supports the existence of such a highly classified system, and top Pentagon officials have hinted that it's 'out there,' but iron-clad confirmation that meets AW&ST standards has remained elusive. Now facing the possibility that this innovative 'Blackstar' system may have been shelved, we elected to share what we've learned about it with our readers, rather than let an intriguing technological breakthrough vanish into 'black world' history, known to only a few insiders."

After the shuttle Challenger disaster in January 1986, and a subsequent string of expendable-booster failures, Pentagon leaders were stunned to learn they no longer had "assured access to space." Suddenly, the U.S. needed a means to orbit satellites necessary to keep tabs on its Cold War adversaries.

The answer: a high-flying, hypersonic jet that would launch a small orbiter into space.

A large "mothership," closely resembling the U.S. Air Force's historic XB-70 supersonic bomber, carries the orbital component conformally under its fuselage, accelerating to supersonic speeds at high altitude before dropping the spaceplane. The orbiter's engines fire and boost the vehicle into space. If mission requirements dictate, the spaceplane can either reach low Earth orbit or remain suborbital.

The manned orbiter's primary military advantage would be surprise overflight. There would be no forewarning of its presence, prior to the first orbit, allowing ground targets to be imaged before they could be hidden. In contrast, satellite orbits are predictable enough that activities having intelligence value can be scheduled to avoid overflights...

Once a Blackstar orbiter reenters the atmosphere, it can land horizontally at almost any location having a sufficiently long runway. So far, observed spaceplane landings have been reported at Hurlburt AFB, Fla.; Kadena AB, Okinawa; and Holloman AFB, N.M.

The spaceplane is capable of carrying an advanced imaging suite that features 1-meter-aperture adaptive optics with an integral sodium-ion-sensing laser. By compensating in real-time for atmospheric turbulence-caused aberrations sensed by the laser, the system is capable of acquiring very detailed images of ground targets or in-space objects, according to industry officials familiar with the package.

One anonymous tipster asks, "Is it possible to design, build and operate such a complex and expensive system and still keep it secret for so long?"

UPDATE 03/06/06 10:15 AM: "Aerospace experts [are] question[ing] a number of claims made for the Blackstar concept," MSNBC's Jim Oberg reports.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources told MSNBC.com that they believed the concept was unworkable, based on principles of rocket design. One source said the mothership would be flying much too slow and too low for a space plane to reach orbital speed after release. When the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency sought proposals for an unmanned RASCAL satellite launcher five years ago, the specifications called for the carrier aircraft to go much higher, and the submitted designs still needed two stages to reach orbital speed.

Latest Comments

Hello, I'm a habitual reader of DefenseTech from Spain and first of all I want to congratulate you for your excellent job. Well, I write you beacause of the recent issue of the Blackstar and the whole lot of reactions it has provoked. I want to send you the direction of a web page you might found interesting (many critics have been directed towards the hypothetical propulsion system of blackstar and the gel-like boron fuel, and this page shows a possible alternative for a two-stage-to-orbit vehicle).The direction is http://www.andrews-space.com/content-main.php?subsection=MTA5 Thanks for your attention.

Posted by: starman2006 at April 28, 2006 3:30 PM


Obergs association of Blackstar's impossibility with the DARPA RASCAL program was predicted by myself months ago. RASCAL was nothing like Blackstar. RASCAL was a fighter sized vehicle saddled with 4 obsolescent stock F-100 engines, absurd reference mission demands that included flying 300 miles to zoom point, loiter time of 30 minutes before zoom, as well as totally absurd hybrid rocket engines (and their horrendously poor Isp) for upper stages, and a requirement to retain fuel for powered flyback and landing. It was essentially designed to "prove" the "impossibility" of spaceplane launchers.
Blackstar allegedly used boron gelled fuels, which would allow Isp of 460 sec if gelled with kerosene, or as much as 600s if gelled with chilled LH2.

Blackstars boron connection is further corroborated by the 1990's federal lawsuit by Groom Lake employees for OSHA violations on base from OSHA violations, specifically the open pit burning of boron containing TPS materials and fuels. At a time when the F-117 no longer operated out of Groom Lake and the base was allegedly closed, employees couldn't get a federal court to force the governments admittance that the base even existed. Why is that?

Posted by: Mike Lorrey at March 8, 2006 10:32 PM


I actually don't see why this is such an exotic idea. It's already been recently done on a smaller scale, and in the privately funded civilian world at that......think Spaceship One (remember the winner of the X-prize).

Posted by: 10th at March 7, 2006 9:04 PM


I know if I say "airship"...that the first thought to come to mind is "blimp". This instead: a very large, RIGID, framed in carbon fiber Lighter-than-Air craft....can indeed reach extremely high altitude, just as stratospheric weather balloons are able to....the only hinderment really is payload. So, launch Pegasus-like from this "mothership"....orbit on demand, more or less.

When DARPA Walrus was first being touted, wording in the solicitation indicated that Pentagon was interested in development of "electrokinetic propulsion" for the airship. Doable, if the craft is big enough for unusual power source. (Like the "Aurora" slip of years back...this wording has been deleted from later writings from DARPA related to Walrus.)

NIDS has postulated on this possible craft. While a lot of that may be dismissed as typical "UFO" hype.....so was stealth technology some years ago.

I vote for this airship. Why? because it is relatively simple, has built in "UFO" deniability, and because it allows the first stage of an orbit on demand system to be somewhat passive....let the actual missile/launch vehicle be the one with the most bugs to work out....

Just a thought....

Posted by: campbell at March 6, 2006 8:04 PM


AFAIK Black Horse/Black Colt were Mitchell Burnside Clapp's ideas for a system of similar capability but operating by in-flight refuelling of the oxidizer after takeoff.

He seems to have been serious about wanting to build one way back when...

Posted by: Phil Fraering at March 6, 2006 7:25 PM


» View All 13 Comments

» Post a Comment