Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

No I.D.? No Sweat!

You know all those people at the airport who tell you that you've got to have ID to get on a flight? They're wrong. "You don't need identification to travel on an airplane," Defense Tech pal Ryan Singel discovers.

Austin.Powers.NY.ID.jpeg"Who says? The TSA [Transportation Security Administration]. 'Passengers are allowed to enter screening area without identification,' TSA spokeswoman Amy Kudwa told this humble reporter today."

The TSA has told the [U.S.] Ninth Circuit [Court of Appeals] in two separate cases (John Gilmore & Daniel Kuualoha Aukai) that airport policy was to let people enter security areas without identification.

Gilmore's Identity Project has been asking for volunteers to see if that was true... [if people really could get through airport security without ID.]

Results, currently mixed. Dog-ate-my homework excuse with contrition gets you less hassle than a flat-out refusal seems to be the pattern, according to folks at the I.D. Project.

So, if you want to fly without identification without telling any white lies, I recommend taking a hearty amount of fortitude and a copy of at least one of the rulings from the Ninth Circuit.

(Big ups: Bill)

Latest Comments

The security checking peoples IDs at the airport are security officers that are not TSA hired, the airport hires these people to work with TSA. The IDs are not really needed but you will ALWAYS be screened more, with them going through your bags and wanding/patting you down. It will always be that way. It really isnt that bad and people shouldnt be giving hard times to these people, they are trying to keep everyone who goes on a plane safe so we dont have another 9/11. What they expect to find it something dangerous that isnt metal (thats why a metal detecter wont go off)! remember not all prohibited items are metal such as sheet explosives! thats the idea for that.

Posted by: RR at February 2, 2007 10:39 AM


I'am gonna get flammed for this, but I think that wand-waving, pat-downs and other "hassles" are actually good. I worked as a supervisor for a military passenger/cargo air terminal from 2000 to 2003, and although a military terminal is far less likely to have anything go "boom", we still took security seriously.
I think that by "changing up" search procedures, ID / NO-ID and other policies, it may keep bad guys off balance.
Besides, I still believe that out greatest threat to commerical aviation is via cargo (and US mail in cargo) with semtex or c-4.

Posted by: Steve at March 28, 2006 10:19 PM


The TSA policy is that if you have either no or an expired ID you are still permitted to fly, however, you are automatically a target of special screening.

This has been the rule for at least the past year and presumably before that.

It seems reasonable enough in my opinion.

Posted by: Nathan at March 28, 2006 8:38 PM


Soooo...what's the deal with the "associated wanding and patdown?" What do they expect to find that the walk-through metal detector doesn't? Isn't this just a meaningless hassle intended to deter people from making an issue of the ID requirement? A personal humiliation that punishes you for being a libertarian smartass?

I wonder if they had enough wands and wandering hands to deal with the possibility of everyone refusing to show ID.

Posted by: James at March 28, 2006 3:18 PM


"From personal experience I was allowed through TSA with no ID," says RC...

Due to an emergency I ended up at the airport with an expired driver's license(it was in the mail). They made me go back to the ticket window and stamped in big red letters "NO ID" on my ticket. With this ticket in hand I was allowed through the "special" line with the associated wanding and patdown.

On my return trip, still no "valid" ID, I went to the ticket window and had my ticket stamped "NO ID". I went throught the "special" line once again no hassle.

Due to my looks I have ended up in the special line a majority of the time anyway so I may just use this in the future as a matter of course.

Posted by: Noah Shachtman at March 28, 2006 3:00 PM


» View All 6 Comments

» Post a Comment