Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Iran's Kooky, Incendiary Arsenal

Super-fast underwater missiles -- they ain't the half of it. Iran's armed forces are rolling out a slew of new military hardware this week, as part of its "Great Prophet" naval war games. Some of the gear seems downright comical. Others, downright dangerous.

iran_flying_boat.jpg(Most of these links are crimped from Kathryn Cramer and Airborne Combat Engineer. Make sure you show 'em a little click-love.)

First, the comical -- a "flying boat," which moves at low altitude above the water. "The vessel appeared to be a more-advanced military version of the common seaplane," Iran Focus observed. "Because of its hull’s advanced design, no radar at sea or in the air can locate it. It can lift out of the water. It is wholly domestically built and can launch missiles with precise targeting while moving," the Mullahs' Defense Ministry mouthpiece crowed. Mayyybe. But ACE notes that "you can buy your own such boat/plane (in kit or finished form)." He finds some pictures of awfully similar craft over here.

Next, the dangerous. The Times takes a look at Tehran's embryonic satellite program. The orbiters the Iranians are launching are crude. "But some Western analysts note that such technologies can also have atomic roles and that a crucial element of a credible nuclear arsenal is the ability to launch a missile accurately and guide a warhead to its target," the Times says.

While Iran now depends on Russia to launch its satellites into orbit [and we know how helpful Moscow is feeling these days -- ed.], it has vowed to do so itself, and is developing a family of increasingly large rockets. In theory, the biggest could hurl not only satellites into space but warheads between continents.

"The real issue is that they have a very large booster under development," said Dr. Anthony H. Cordesman, a military analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington who wrote a recent report on Iran's nuclear effort.

Closer to home, Tehran is bragging about an "advanced shoulder-launched rocket 'Mithaq 1' - which can be carried by IRGC fast ships and used on shore and on islands - was successfully test-fired," Iran Focus quotes a military spokesperson as saying.

The Mithaq 1 anti-aircraft rockets have a heat tracking device and are "fast" and "manoeuvrable," the report said, adding that they were particularly good at targeting light helicopters...

Iran also has the Mithaq 2 on its production line. The more advanced rocket is [almost identical to the Chinese shoulder-fired missiles and is] capable of destroying choppers and jet fighters which fly at low altitude. Tehran claims that it is good for use in electronic warfare and it can also hit fake targets.

misagh-2_crowd.jpgOn Friday, Iran "tested the Fajr-3, a missile that it said can avoid radars and hit several targets simultaneously using multiple warheads," the Associated Press noted. Again, it appears to be based on a Chinese model.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies' Jason Alderwick, reminds Reuters about the Iranian habit of "military bravado and posturing."

But Tim Ripley, with Jane's, adds that, "You don't actually need lots of weapons to close (the Strait of Hormuz), you just need lots of threats... "You don't even have to sink a ship, you just have to double the insurance rates (for shipping) and it has a knock on effect on the price of oil."

And Kathryn Cramer notes that the man behind Tehran's new technologies is a seriously bad dude -- the man "responsible for recruitment of suicide bombers in Iran’s armed forces." Not coincidentally, Brigadier General Hossein Salami also crafted Iran's doctrine of "the massive use of suicide operations to target U.S. and Western interests around the world, and the use of weapons of mass destruction."

UPDATE 5:12 PM: "For months, I have told interviewers that no senior political or military official was seriously considering a military attack on Iran. In the last few weeks, I have changed my view," says Joseph Cirincione, with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "In part, this shift was triggered by colleagues with close ties to the Pentagon and the executive branch who have convinced me that some senior officials have already made up their minds: They want to hit Iran."

(Big ups: Kevin Drum)

UPDATE 04/05/06 3:12 PM: Well, now we've got the sneaky missile hat trick. "Iran said Wednesday it has successfully test-fired a "top secret" missile, the third within a week, state-run television reported." To which Kathryn asks, "If it's so secret, what's it doing on TV?"

Latest Comments

No offense, but I'm not too worried... and do you seriously think the US hasn't updated AEGIS to counter cruise missiles? and what about our Phalanx CIWS? THat should counter cruise missiles, with its own independent radar... just like their new shkval based torpedo 223 mph... but only a 5 mile range. and that missile... yea , right... a huge scud-like missile is gonna be radar-evading.... and does anyone besides me remember (or at least know about) Operation Praying Mantis in the 80's? Iran's arsenal is worse than that of North Korea.

Posted by: Alex at October 11, 2006 9:50 PM


in response to Ali Soltani: with all due respect US has no interest in have a democracy in Iran they had it but then had the govt over thrown and brought the shah back, as to isreal being a demoracy, what dream world planet are you living on?, how can a country(US) thats not a democracy itsself convince others to become one??

Posted by: flabbergested at September 1, 2006 7:36 PM


Iran has Russian made Moskit and Yakhnot cruise missiles. US Navy does not currently have any defence against them. Soviets designed them to penetrate AEGIS defence. See http://reddit.com/info/8w4k/comments/c8wx7 for for more information.

Posted by: notany at July 17, 2006 11:40 AM


Actually the hover craft is the most dangerous cause USa has no efficient method to launch an attack to faster than helicopter(wich cant aim that hig speed targets well) howering object. It cant be torpedoed either. Thats why the military is now testind with the old carriers. Eguipped with superfast torpedoes few of these can remove the full mediterranean fleet in couple of hours. Thats why Australia developed em. Because they are unlimitedly hard to hit. Well not? Ok say one.. just ONE workin missile other long distance defense. Remember No radar/emission/laser aimed or seek missiles allowed(actually all missiles not hitting straigth are bound to sink). No heliweponary ect either caus these things move too fast for those and helis CAN be hit when radar is this low:)

Posted by: Ops at June 19, 2006 11:38 AM


Iranian strategy seems to be based on the Chinese swarm doctrine. Sow a couple of thousand mines across the strait of Hormuz, cover it with many batteries of advanced SAMS and silkworms...
THe soviets used to use the bastion technique.... Iran can use the same doctrine, without having to protect SSBN's. As long as they can say who goes past Hormuz they are the masters of the universe

Posted by: jOSH at May 3, 2006 1:27 AM


» View All 22 Comments

» Post a Comment