Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

How AT&T Helped the NSA Snoop

wiretap.jpgRyan Singel has himself a big, fat scoop. We already knew that telecom companies were cooperating with the NSA to eavesdrop on domestic and international communications. Now, Ryan reveals how it was done.

AT&T provided National Security Agency eavesdroppers with full access to its customers' phone calls, and shunted its customers' internet traffic to data-mining equipment installed in a secret room in its San Francisco switching center, according to a former AT&T worker...

According to a statement released by Klein's attorney, an NSA agent showed up at the San Francisco switching center in 2002 to interview a management-level technician for a special job. In January 2003, Klein observed a new room being built adjacent to the room housing AT&T's #4ESS switching equipment, which is responsible for routing long distance and international calls...

"While doing my job, I learned that fiber optic cables from the secret room were tapping into the Worldnet (AT&T's internet service) circuits by splitting off a portion of the light signal," Klein wrote.

The split circuits included traffic from peering links connecting to other internet backbone providers, meaning that AT&T was also diverting traffic routed from its network to or from other domestic and international providers, according to Klein's statement.

The secret room also included data-mining equipment called a Narus STA 6400, "known to be used particularly by government intelligence agencies because of its ability to sift through large amounts of data looking for preprogrammed targets."

UPDATE 04/10/06 9:10 AM: Lots more on Naurus' data-sniffing products here, including one "capable of monitoring 10 billion bits of data per second."

Latest Comments

Hmm. Risking lives in exchange for pure entertainment? (pedestrian's comment). There's nothing entertaining about having the government breath down your neck. For decades we've heard of the secret government tapes that turn on if you whisper code words like "kill bush" or "Cheney is a big fat weeny". Now we are told that wire tapping is alive and rampant and backed by one of the biggest phone companies. On one hand, if you're doing nothing wrong, who cares what they're listening to, but on the other hand, why do I have to conduct every conversation with the implicit knowledge that somebody or some robot is listening to my every word, every nuance, and categorizing every number and time of call? They most likely aren't categorizing your grandma's banana bread recipe, but they are recording it in the first place. Maybe they can use the information for marketing purposes: Osama's Baked Banana Bread Surprise. Oh—ha—what a funny joke.

Posted by: jlbellinger at April 20, 2006 8:02 PM


Well, gee, Rutty, that was constructive.

John, I've read this article, and every other one I've run across that tries to justify this sort of broad-based surveillance, and your arguments just don't hold up for me.

Who decides who's flagged as a terrorist? What do you do if you are erroneously so flagged, and you find yourself in a detention camp?

The Constitution is not a document that we should follow if it's not inconvenient. It is the most important definition of what our country is, and what it stands for, and we absolutely can not afford to throw it out the window whenever we get scared.

What do our leaders and our military forces swear to defend and protect? Is that oath meaningless?

Posted by: Lee Gibson at April 9, 2006 3:52 PM


Everytime these type of articles are published, it is risking American lives in the war on terror in trade for pure entertainment (only few value from such information, more likely the enemy). In other words, Defense Tech staff could be one to indirectly kill people by providing information to the terrorists like this article has done. Yes, you can kill people by information, just like Navsats attempt to send people in to death traps by non-existing phantom routes.

Posted by: pedestrian at April 9, 2006 8:30 AM


I hope these surveillance programs stay in place long enough for Democrats to regain control of the federal government. "ALL your private thoughts are belong to us. Mwahahahahahaha!!"

Posted by: Chris at April 8, 2006 11:45 PM


John: as you say, I'm sure. But this is bad news for America and AT&T. The US handles most of the world's internet traffic because other nations use our networks instead of building their own. The reason they use our network instead of building their own is because of the Bill of Rights, the perceived firewall between the government and private persons.

The Founding Fathers never heard of firewalls, but they invented the greatest one, just the same. Now that firewall has been breached and the next decade will see the end of US dominance in telecommunications because our most important comparative advantage has been frittered away. The communications of the future will go through networks that not only cannot be monitored randomly, but which cannot be accessed with US warrants.

Feel safer yet?

Trust can be built, but not rebuilt. People did business with the US on the assumption of certain rules that were rewritten in secret. They won't get fooled again. It's not trivial. The Soviet Union was very safe inside its crumbling bunker. They were also very poor.

Posted by: James at April 8, 2006 11:39 PM


» View All 11 Comments

» Post a Comment