Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

NASA, China in Space Link?

The Chinese National Space Administration recently invited NASA’s head to visit China. The hope is that would be the first step in future cooperation between the two agencies, a first date in case “we need to get married some day.”

pla34.jpgThis kind of exchange – and the cooperative work that would hopefully come of it – can only be good. Confidence Building Measures between China and the US, particularly in space, are absolutely essential. Both America and China have each expressed concerns about the other looking to weaponize space:

“The pace and scope of China’s military build-up already puts regional military balances at risk. China is likely to continue making large investments in high-end, asymmetric military capabilities, emphasizing electronic and cyber-warfare; counter-space operations…” Quadrennial Defense Review, Feb 2006

“China is developing or improving counter-reconnaissance and counter-space capabilities using a range of solutions from low-tech denial and deception… to high-tech lasers and space-tracking devices.”
DOD Assessment of China’s military power, 2005

“At present, the danger of weaponization of outer space is increasing with each passing day. Taking weapons into outer space will lead to an arms race there and make it a new arena for military confrontation.”

“The nuclear deterrence strategy based on the first use of nuclear weapons has yet to be abandoned. The trend towards lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons and developing new nuclear weapons is worrisome. There has been greater danger of weaponization of and an arms race in outer space.”
China’s White Paper on Arms Control, Sep 2005

Each nation is likely to weaponize space in the coming decades if it’s convinced the other is trying to do so – that’s Arms Races 101. There’s no guarantee (and, admittedly, not a great chance) that cooperation in peaceful space exploration will prevent a space arms race. But it can’t hurt.

-- Matthew Tompkins

UPDATE 9:30 AM: Looks like there may be some cooperation between the Russian and American military space programs, too.

Comments

Hello this is nice site more information in this archives. Thanks!

Posted by: online pharmacy at November 3, 2006 10:42 AM


I disagree that their would be any technology transfer threat to the U.S. from cooperating with China. They have already established their "Space Club" credentials by launching a manned space flight and developing a viable commercial launch industry. Check out the new "China Security" journal from the World Security Institute. They devote an entire issue to discussing the Chinese space program and the merits of U.S.-China cooperation in space. As several of the authors point out, regulations to prevent technology transfer to China have hurt the U.S. space industry more then they have helped.

Posted by: Greg Schnippel at April 11, 2006 11:34 AM


This could be the most short sighted move NASA could ever make. There is one reason China wants to "cooperate" with the US. That is to "borrow" and technology that they can not produce on their own. If you need any proof of this, you have to look no farther that the "cooperation" that GM entered into with China. What was it a full three years before China designed and built a car that was nearly bolt for bolt identical to the car that GM trained the Chinese company to build for them? China is not a threat today, but they are certainly growing fast enough so that they will be albe to give us a run for our money in the next few years.

Posted by: Will at April 10, 2006 11:58 AM


» Post a Comment