Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Border Tech Upgrade?

When I drove into Ft. Huachuca, Arizona last year, one of the first things I noticed was the aerostat lingering above the horizon, keeping track of the Mexican border, just a few miles away. A couple of days later, I visited with a pair of Border Patrol agents, who showed me how their new flying drone had helped them catch illegals crossing into the country. They couldn't wait to get another.

drones_wired.jpgNow, the Times tells us, the Bush administration wants to expand the use of techno-goodies like these along the border -- at a cost of $2 billion.

Lawmakers are skeptical. "We've been presented with expensive proposals for elaborate border technology that eventually have proven to be ineffective and wasteful," Representative Harold Rogers, Republican of Kentucky, said. So are some of my favorite homeland security analysts, like Christian Beckner. He notes that the Border Patrol's Predator B robotic spy plane, which crashed last month, sucked up about $7,808 per apprehension -- compared to a $1,166 per-catch average cost for the rest of the Patrol's budget.

So, clearly, there needs to be big-time oversight of this "Secure Border Initiative" -- especially if companies like Northrop are going to come up with hare-brained schemes like watching for coyotes from 65,000 feet. And, obviously, no technology is going to beat boots on the ground -- trained boots, that is.

But still, I'm inclined to give the administration the benefit of the doubt here. The Border Patrol -- especially in the Tuscon sector, around Ft. Huachuca -- has a nearly impossible job, trying to catch millions of illegals with just a few thousand agents. The least we can do is equip 'em right.

Latest Comments

Effective remote control of pilotless vehicles and aircraft is possible today. With a "driver" or "pilot" on the ground at a remote site a safe and cost effective alternative to piloted or auto-controlled vehicles and drones is available now.

Remote control via currently available sophisticated techniques can dramatically reduce the risk and cost of border patrol, warfare, and other security operations.

Posted by: C. Van Milligen at May 29, 2006 9:20 AM


BIG PROBLEM IS UR PREZ, BOY GEORGE, WHO IS BI AT BEST. HIS FAVORITE PASSTIME IS PLAYING PITCH AND CATCH WITH BRER FOX, PRESIDENTE OF THE HATCHERY OF MESICO. QUERY WHO IS THE CATCHER IN THIS PERVERTED GAME?

Posted by: P. A. at May 20, 2006 6:55 PM


I lived in Yuma AZ and El Centro CA for awhile and my wife worked for the Border Patrol in both places(1956-57) and the "bracero program" was in effect then. The "loss rate" then, of aliens coming into the country and simply vanishing at the end of their workday, was about 20%...it has not improved in all those years. If we could legally shoot one or two a month, the flow would stop, or at least decrease some, I'm pretty sure.

Posted by: Larry Usoff USN Ret. at May 19, 2006 7:11 AM


I'm interested to know your opinions on the Hayden confirmation quote where Hayden says he "can't say" whether contractors are subject to the Geneva Conventions. Check out my blog, exclusively devoted to contractors and related issues, to comment...

Posted by: contractmonitor at May 18, 2006 3:57 PM


Many folks complain because low tech solutions exist. They're also cheaper than border agents.

It's called a wall, and most people think we already have one.

Posted by: Ivan at May 18, 2006 12:28 PM


» View All 6 Comments

» Post a Comment