Coast Guard vs. Small Boats
In an interview today with Reuters, new Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen discussed an item that he intends to have at the top of his agenda: countering the threat from explosive-bearing small boats. From the story:
The United States must close security gaps that could let small boats packed with explosives slip into ports and stage attacks like the one that killed 17 men on the U.S. warship Cole in Yemen, the new Coast Guard chief said on Wednesday.
Adm. Thad Allen, who took over as commandant of the Coast Guard last week, said officials had to do more to help thwart such stealthy strikes, which could cause massive damage to ports, oil facilities, ports, cruise ships or tankers.
"Our own threat analysis and vulnerability analysis tell us there is a significant threat by vessel-borne improvised explosive devices," Allen told Reuters in an interview.
"We haven't put nearly as much thinking in science and technology and (general) thought into the small-vessel threat as we need to, and I think that's where we need to go next."
....As one of his first goals in office, Allen is devising a new security strategy over the next few months which will look at issues such as the small-boat threat, as well as the feasibility of licensing a broader range of boats or imposing exclusion zones around some high-risk areas.
Current shipping regulations, such as the United Nations International Ship and Port Facility Security code and related U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act, focus on large commercial ships, not the roughly 60 million U.S. recreational vessels.
There is no national registry or national system of operator licensing for recreational boats.
This decision to focus on the small-vessel threat represents a change of tack for the Coast Guard, which has largely focused, at least by all public appearances, on large vessels and seaport facility security. Addressing this threat will not be easy, given the large number of recreational boats in the nation's waterways and their relative anonymity, but I'm glad to see that Allen is not deterred by the challenge. And I'm curious to hear what he has in mind in terms of new technologies that might address this threat. The development of the Nationwide Automatic Identification System will certainly play a role. But many of the technologies that have been developed to address this threat are designed to be used in a military context and aggressively prevent a USS Cole-type attack - but these technologies are not necessarily appropriate in a domestic context. There are a few technologies out there that seem suited for the domestic environment, but a lot more R&D is needed to address this threat.
-- Christian Beckner (cross-posted from Homeland Security Watch)
Good Morning Folks,
In principle this seems to be a good idea but, in practice, well it's simply another case of good intention gone bad it appears. Example.
I live in San Diego and one of our local attractions is a 5K Acre water park know as Mission Bay. Mission Bay is a recretational only body of water. The only commerical activities are Sea World and about a halh dozen hotels and a few sport fishing boats, that's it.
Last Feb. while visiting a friend who lives on Mission Bay on a Wednesday, during a two hour period, one to three in the afternoon, I counted eleven Law Enforcement boats on the bay.
There was Fish and Game, Harbor Patrol, Lifeguards, Local Police, State Police, DEA, etc. Even the Coast Guard was there with a Partrol Boat with a mounted M-60 machine gun with an ammo can attcahed in the bow.
They were the only thing happening that afternoon on the bay. A reasonable citizen would assume that Mission Bay on a slow weekday in Winter didn't require this much protection. There is over kill and then there is overkill.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
Posted by: Byron Skinner at June 2, 2006 2:31 PM