Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

DARPA's Secret Space Slingshot?

A Trident missile is not the only way of putting a warhead anywhere in the world on target at short notice. A couple of weeks back I mentioned the Slingatron, which appeared in a US Army report on possible low-cost routes to space. The idea of a giant spiral Hula Hoop, somewhat bigger than a football stadium and oscillating at about nine revolutions a second, may seem a bit radical to some people. But – if you didn’t know already – no idea is too radical for DARPA. Budget documents reveal that they are not just doing studies. They have their very own Slingatron program , budgeted at at $3 million for 2006 rising to $4 million in 2007. Here's how it's described:
slingatron2.JPG

The Slingatron program will use modern engineering and physics concepts to accelerate masses to extremely high velocities. This mechanical mass acceleration concept, based on using centripetal body forces, is fundamentally different from electro-magnetic accelerators and hence avoids the limitations of those machines. Initial studies have demonstrated the fundamental feasibility of the Slingatron concept. This program will explore the concept’s bounding limits and seek to develop uses for the technology within those limits. Included in this program will be studies of the key technologies that will allow the accelerator to achieve very high projectile energies.

The program plans are nothing if not ambitious, aiming to:

- Fabricate experimental launchers.

- Demonstrate mass launchers that range in capabilities over three to four orders of magnitude.

- Demonstrate mass velocities on the order of several km/s and perhaps higher than 10km/s.

However, a perusal of DARPA’s latest plans showed no sign of the Slingatron. I checked with the Agency itself, and spokeswoman Jan Walker advised me:

"We did some preliminary investigation and results were not promising, so we decided not to proceed further."

This could mean one of two things. Either the idea is too crazy even for DARPA, and it really cannot be made to work. Or else it does work, and the whole thing has gone underground, with a giant black program somewhere to construct one of these things. If a huge rotating structure appears in your neck of the woods, accompanied by occasional whooshing sounds and shooting stars…I’d advise you to stay quiet about it.

THERE'S MORE The U.S. Air Force has its own ideas about ground-based space launchers according to this piece in New Scientist magazine. The work is being carried out by LaunchPoint Technologies who are working on an innovative magnetic space launch system. It’s based on a sled which works like a maglev train running on a circular track. When it reaches a high enough speed - which might take a large number of revolutions - it is diverted off the track and off into space. LaunchPoint suggest that they will be able to put payloads into orbit for as little as $750/lb for their first system, perhaps later dropping to $100/lb, against current costs of $4,000/lb or more. Such a device could also be used to launch projectiles. The initial capital cost would be expensive – but then Trident submarines are not cheap either, and they're not so useful for putting up satellites.

-- David Hambling

Latest Comments


Sorry, scientific papers are here:
http://www.slingatron.com/publications.htm

Especially this:
http://www.slingatron.com/Publications/Linked/The%20Spiral%20Slingatron%20Mass%20Launcher.pdf

On the physcis of using a slingatron for space launch

Posted by: David Hambling at June 6, 2006 3:51 PM



I don't think any laws of physics are being threatened here - DARPA and the US Army are not as stupid as you seem to imply - check out the papers listed
here and The Spiral Slingatron Mass Launcher in particular.

Then again, there were people saying the Wright Brothers had it all wrong too :)

Posted by: David hambling at June 6, 2006 3:48 PM



It doesn't violate basic physics, but the risks are way too big even for DARPA. They're not stupid and that's what they will have been studying. The folks at http://www.slingatron.com/ still reckon it works though.

Posted by: Dyson at June 6, 2006 2:44 AM


Why do you act like it is a surprise that DARPA canceled this? As was pointed out last time you posted about the project, it defies basic physics. Even DARPA notices such glaring errors sooner or later.

Posted by: Tim at June 5, 2006 7:24 PM


General Atomics of San Diego, Ca. (www.ga.com) has developed electrically driven linear linear motors to launch U.S.Naval aircraft from their newest aircraft carrier that is in construction today. These launchers can be scaled to launch any mass desired. Power generation and storage needs to be scaled to match the launch energy requirements as well.

Place such a system on the side of a very tall mountain peak, at the desired azimuth and elevation angle and you probably will have replaced the first stage of a mass launcher. The inital high altitude of the launcher reduces air drag as well.

If the mountain is near a sea port and rail access developed, the launch rate could be significant.

G forces would probably exceed what humans could endure unless the launcher were long enough to allow lower acceleration forces.

Posted by: James L. Young at June 5, 2006 5:02 PM


» View All 7 Comments

» Post a Comment