Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Pentagon Wants Jet Fuel Substitute

The Defense Department buys more jet fuel than any other organization in the world. So the Pentagon's higher-ups are just as sick as the rest of us -- more so -- about sky-high fuel prices. Small wonder that the brass is asking for proposals to supply 200 million gallons of synthetic jet fuel, as part of big-league field tests in 2008 and 2009.

f22_engine.jpg
The request, notes Inside Green Business, comes from the Defense Energy Support Center (DESC), which oversees the Pentagon’s fuel purchases. It's part of a larger military investigation into an eighty year-old process for converting coal or natural gas into liquid fuel called Fischer-Tropsch. It's what helped the German Army make 124,000 barrels of fuel per day during World War II.

The possible purchase would send 100 million gallons each to the Air Force and Navy for testing on ships, airplanes and other operational units, according to a DESC source. The alternative fuels would likely be blended with existing DOD fuel types, such as the Air Force’s JP-8 and the Navy’s F-76, in a 50/50 mixture or similar ratio, according to the source. “There won’t be enough alternative fuels to do a one hundred percent [alternative] blend for at least a decade,” the source says, “but even reducing petroleum fifty percent in this country is huge. What DESC is saying is we don’t want [carbon dioxide] greenhouse gases emitted into the atmosphere.”

The source says each of the military services wants to maintain its current single-fuel policy, under which all vehicles are run with as similar a fuel type as possible. DOD officials want to use 50/50 blends “widely” for the service tests at first, with an eye to potentially retooling the ratio for optimum efficiency later on...

There may... be problems finding a supplier, or even a combination of suppliers, that can satisfy the request for alternative fuels. “No domestic infrastructure can [currently] handle that much” demand, says the DESC source, adding that the purchase would likely be from a combination of coal-based Fischer-Tropsch fuel and fuel derived from tar sands and oil shale, which have been eyed by government and industry planners as potential sources of synthetic petroleum. There currently is no widespread market in the U.S. for such petroleum alternatives, although the source says “hopefully this will be an impetus for private industry to use synthetic fuels as well. Because the private sector doesn’t have the research and development budget we do, they’re waiting to see how our projects go so they can adopt whatever we develop.”

Latest Comments

The Earth uses the Fischer-Tropsch synthjesis, and we can use it, on anything with a higher content of carbon, than, hydrogen, in Molecular terms. i.e. you can use sugar, starch, and wood or paper for making ethanol, but cole, coke, rubber, etc. for making crude oil. And the heavy oil and asphalt/tar you can use for making lighter fractions. But, we bwill never run out of oil anyway.... And sequestred co2, can be used to make oil too, if you react it with mmorev reduced carbon. So the Al Gore bunch, are not about saving the Earth, but about making new taxes.
Al Gore has never been corrrect, except, "politically". Carbon is not a polutant, only politics and toxic chemicals are,

Posted by: T. Schanke at September 15, 2009 3:45 PM


Sorry, hyperlink didn't work, here is the web address for that link:

http://www.pnas.org/content/99/17/10976.full

Posted by: quantum_flux at August 24, 2008 8:03 PM


Peak Oil will not happen, that just a myth like the Piltdown Man. Oil isn't actually derived from sedimentary rock at all, it actually is produced in the upper mantle of the Earth (100+ kilometers down) and is far more abundant than the oxygen in our atmosphere to react with it:

The Evolution of Multicomponent Systems at High Pressures: The genesis of hydrocarbons and the origin of petroleum

Posted by: quantum_flux at August 24, 2008 8:02 PM


Jet Blue's president suggests mine mouth atomic powered coal to fuel conversion.

The German coal to gas process would produce gasoline for $1.50/gal in 1980 - but this was a manual process. Similar processes take days to adjust or "line out." Add computer control and good product is produced after less than an hour.

Add low cost atomic power to avoid wasting coal to heat the process and the ability to "dump" waste back in abandoned areas of the mine and you have a win/win situation.

The president of Jet Blue's advisors have worked out all the math, including subsidizing the operation to get it started - looks good to me.

Now how do you keep the government from killing the project with bureaucratic stupidity?

Posted by: Gene Trower at January 3, 2007 5:49 PM


Speaking of synth-fuels, Germany finaly all but collapsed when the 8th air force comcentrated their bombing on the german synth [coal] plants.

In the future, I believe 75 to 85% of whats in your small fuel tank, running the {SMALL} ETH-85 powered ENGINE THAT KEEPS YOUR PLUG IN BATTERY RECHARGED, when you drive over 200 miles in one day. THE FEUL THAT POWERS YOUR CAR will be celose ethanol with 15 to 25% gasoline. Think of it as a 300 miles per gallon auto!

Then again when the middle east oil fields run dry in fifty years or so and and the rest of opec is no more. The world will turn to the more costly[65 to 75 bucks a barrel] oil shale for their oil needs.

By most acounts there are 262 trillin barrels of oil locked up in oil shale around the world. of this 262 trillion barrels 222 trillion barrels are right here in the united states. so fifty or seventy years from now The united states becomes Opec and every one will hate us even more! No matter how fair we treat the rest of the world.

Then again it might be nice for our grand kids knowing they will have no income tax because the money to run the federal goverment will be coming from these sales!

Posted by: davids at December 16, 2006 4:44 PM


» View All 12 Comments

» Post a Comment