Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Iraqi TV Ad: Stop Your Suicide Bombing

Coming soon to Iraqi TV: million-dollar, sixty-second, public service announcements, featuring "exploding cars, flying Matrix-style stuntmen and... messages like 'Don't Suicide Bomb.'"

IraqPSA.jpgNewsweek reports from "an industrial block in downtown LA [turned] into a busy Baghdad square" -- the scene for a 120-camera shoot, designed to capture simulated carnage in the "frozen-in-time feeling" of "The Matrix." The spot is supposed to persuade wannabe insurgents to put down their IEDs. Never mind the fact that "the cost of owning a TV is often prohibitive for the average Iraqi."

At least 60 extras dressed in hijabs, kaffiyehs and polyester-wool blend slacks were herded onto the set to simulate an average shopping day. But there was hardly any Arabic spoken on this Baghdad street. Spanish, Punjabi and even Italian could be heard as extras gathered around the Kraft services table to munch on chips and guacamole. When asked if he is Iraqi, Bidkar Ramos, an extra on the set, laughs. "No, I'm Chinese and Mexican,” he says. “Like most of these people, I'm just a look-alike."

Onlookers were later asked to stand back as the pyrotechnic crew blew up a poor old Yugo coupe and stunt men and women, padded under their Arab garb, were thrust into the air with ropes and pulleys to simulate the impact of a bomb exploding...

This pricey and unorthodox attempt to subdue the violence is backed by a group of mystery donors. "I call them an independent, non-governmental group of scholars, non political people," says Plotkin. "Some may live in Iraq, some may live abroad. For a variety of different reasons—from safety concerns to wanting the focus to remain on the issue itself, they decided to remain anonymous."

(Big ups: PRK)

Comments

The commercials probably won't work, but your comment about the cost of TV being too high for most Iraqis may not be true.
Here in the Philippines, the cost of a new tv is high. But most families who have electricity can pool their money to buy a used TV. Here in the Philippines, a used Korean TV costs 20 to 40 Dollars US...a VCD player 20 dollars, and a VCD of the latest movies, thanks to chinese pirates, only 50 cents.
In a war, remember: The priority is escapism.\
As for the commercials, could I suggest a good soap opera with subplots of families divided and then hurt by suicide bombing? That would be a lot more successful.

Posted by: Boinkie at June 23, 2006 5:48 AM


I concur with JimK about the TV's. Newsweek stringers must be spending too much time in the comfort of their green zone motel rooms again. Having spent a year in Iraq working in the field, I'd guess that at least 40% of houses have TV, which is growing because satellite recievers are now allowed (banned under Saddam). Of course, I am pretty certain that an Iraqi wouldn't be able to pay what you or I would pay at Best Buy, but the markets and exchange rates are different over there (not to mention, they repair stuff instead of throwing it away like we do - so there is a pretty brisk used market as well). In addition, TV is viewed a lot in public area like coffee shops and such, so despite Newsweek's contention, TV probably would be a pretty effective medium.

Posted by: Nerf at June 22, 2006 12:15 PM


If owning a TV is so cost-prohibitive, why do I see so many satellite dishes on Iraqi houses? Seriously, check the thousands of photos taken over the last few years.

Besides, the terrorists DO have TVs. They monitor the media. If *one* guy decides to stop being a bomber, it's worth it. If he convinces one more...and so on.

Posted by: JimK at June 22, 2006 4:21 AM


I can just imagine how the planning meeting for this went. Someone certainly shouted "It's so crazy it just might work!"

Posted by: moonbiter at June 21, 2006 11:54 AM


Over-under on how long until the vid appears on the website of some previously-unknown terror cell which tries to claim responsibility for the "attack" depicted? Much like the infamous (and hilarious!) incident of the Ernie-and-Bert-and-Osama photos?

Posted by: Haninah at June 21, 2006 10:56 AM


» Post a Comment