Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Lasers: Israel's Rocket Defense?

It was, perhaps, the most successful laser gun in the history of energy weapons. Now, it could just prove to be the key to Israel's defense. Maybe.

ACF9C35.jpgIn the early part of this decade, the Israeli and American militaries worked with Northrop Grumman to build the Tactical High Energy Laser, or THEL. During tests at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, the chemical-powered energy weapon blasted out of the sky 28 Katyusha rockets -- just like the ones now assaulting Israel. Another 18 artillery shells and mortars were successfully zapped, as well. No other laser has ever come close to building up that kind of track record. (Here's a video of some of the shoot-downs.)

"All my career, I've been interested in fielding lasers," Jeff Sollee, a veteran Northrop laser scientist, told Defense Tech earlier this year. "THEL was as close as they come."

But generating the THEL's megawatts of laser power required hundreds of gallons of toxic chemicals — ethylene, nitrogen trifluoride. The weapons grew bulky; one proposed small-scale version was supposed to be kept in a mere eight cargo containers, each 40 feet long. A mobile THEL, on just a couple of trucks, proved to be too complex, and too expensive to contemplate. Worse, after a few shots, the lasers would have to be resupplied with a fresh batch of reactants. The logistics of hauling those toxins either through the air or across a battlefield made generals shiver. Israel eventually dropped out of the program. Then America did, too, turning its focus instead to solid-state, electric lasers.

Now, Northrop is pushing an upgraded THEL, under the name SkyGuard. The system is being pushed for airport defense, to keep jetliners safe from shoulder-fired missiles (kind of like this microwave-based missile-zapper from Raytheon I reported on last year).

But "Northrop executives have pitched [the] laser system in meetings with Israeli officials, including Defense Minister Amir Peretz," the Wall Street Journal reports. "Based on Israel's expression of interest in the laser technology, he said, Northrop has begun the process of applying for an export license."

SkyGuard is about a quarter the size of the original THEL, although not much smaller than the eight-container proposal. Northrop claims that the system's exhaust is mostly helium and steam, and requires a "keep out zone" of only 30 meters, Aerospace Daily notes. The price: maybe $200 million, plus $1,000 per shot.

Raytheon is also pitching Israel on air defense, too -- but not the microwave system. A few years back, the company began modifying its Phalanx 4,500 round-per-minute gun, originally designed for ship defense, to knock down mortars.

The WSJ says that "six batteries currently are deployed in Iraq." And from the reports I've heard, the Phalanxes are performing rather well, with several confirmed kills. Presumably, the systems could be shipped to Israel in fairly short order. The laser-based Skyguard is still very much on the drawing board, however. So Israel would still have to wait quite a while for its speed-of-light defense.

(Big ups: BB)

UPDATE 7/18/06 11:13 AM: According to a company spokesperson, Northrop thinks it can squeeze Skyguard "into the equivalent of three standard, 20-foot ISO containers" -- much less than the eight contemplated before.

Latest Comments

Opium for the masses.

Posted by: joe at August 14, 2006 12:01 PM


i have enjoyed the religous comments on both sides, although i agree that jesus and the father are one. i am curious though, as to why there is this type of discussion on a "defensetech" web site...that is very humorous i think.

i will pray for the salvation of the guy who thinks that jesus is not the same as the father, my friend, if you do not have your faith in jesus to save you, then it appears that you might be in some trouble, i hope you will come to find true peace through jesus christ.

jeremy

Posted by: jeremy at August 13, 2006 4:14 AM


This goes to Noah, You used John chap.10, "Jesus said" Philip I have been with you this long and you still don't know me?, (I'm paraphrasing) if you have seen me, you have seen the Father, the Father is in me, and I am in the Father, Noah, get this, the Father is in him, not with him, there is a difference you know!! Read John chapter 10 again, it does not say with him, "Jesus said the Father is in him, Jesus is the Father, the eternal Father, you need to quit saying he's with the Father, or the father is with him, no!, "Jesus is the everlasting Father" according to Isaiah, Jesus is God!!!, he was the invisible God of the Old Testament, becoming visible in the New Testament, drop me a line Noah.

Posted by: Jonathan Repka at July 20, 2006 11:39 PM


Ahmedinajad,

Peace be to you.

I respect your strong faith in what you believe, but you are mistaken about Jesus. You can't make Jesus mesh with Islam. You can't quote verses from the Bible that fit your belief system and then ignore the verses that don't fit. You have to look at all of them or none of them. You can't pick and choose.

You are correct in showing in Scripture that Jesus got his authority and His power to do miracles from the Father and that the miracles proved that the Father was with Him; However, you are incorrect in saying that Jesus is not Divine. Here is where you left out all of the verses where Jesus said that He is Divine. So if Jesus is not Divine then He is a liar. If He is a liar then the Father is not with Him. If the Father is not with Him, then how can He do any miracles since only true miralcles can only come from the authority of the Father?

An earlier commentor already mentioned John 8:58 where Jesus said, "Before Abraham was, I was." What about the argument that Jesus gave the Jews when they said that He wasn't Divine. This too is in John, chapter 10 verses 30-38,

"I and My Father are one.�Then the Jews took up stones again to stone Him. Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?�The Jews answered Him, saying,“For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.�Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods"? If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me; but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him.�(If Jesus does the works of the Father, how can He also lie about who He is?)

In John 14:6 Jesus says, "I am the way, the truth, and the LIfe. No one comes to the Father except through me." (The only way to the Father is by accepting Jesus' gift of salvation. There is no other way to the Father)

In John 14:10-11, Jesus says "Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father who dwells in Me does the works. Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me, or else believe Me for the sake of the works themselves. (The same Authority that gives Him power to do miracles is the same Authority that tells Him what to say.)

Ahmedinajad, if Jesus is not the Son of God then He is a liar, but how can this be if the Father's power is with Him? If He is a liar , then He has no power from the Father, but if He has power from the Father then He is not a liar and every single thing that He said is true!

One last Scripture for you. In John 3:16, Jesus says, "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."

So you see, to pick and choose from the New Testament what meshes with your beliefs defies logic. For something to be true it has to be 100% true. If it is 99% true and 1% false then it is still a lie. If you believe that there is any truth to the New Testament (and I think you do otherwise you would not quote it) then you need to know that it is 100% true. I pray in Jesus' name that He will show you this truth.

Sincerely,

Noah

Posted by: Noah at July 20, 2006 4:37 PM


Response to SALAAM, SHALOM, PEACE that was posted July 15, 06

It would seem that our Muslim friend is the one who has trouble with elementary math, plus lack of plain english reading skills, when it comes to reading the Bible.

He correctly asserts that "If the prophet Abraham was tested to sacrifice Ismael(Ishmael) and not Issaac then both Judaism and Christianity are destroyed and vice-versa for Islam. I couldn't agree with him more on this point. (Psalms 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?)

He comments two grave errors in his ascertion that Ishmael was 17 years old in Gen. 21:14-21:
1. He adds 3 years to the age of Ishmael for weaning, why does weaning make one 3 years older?
The Bible clearly states that the age difference between Abramhams sons was 14 years.

2. He adds to the word of God by calling Ishmael and "infant", and claiming that Hagar put Ishmael on her shoulder, that Ishmael was crying like a baby.
Genesis 21:14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba.
In the above verse, we see that Abraham put the bread and the bottle of water on her shoulder, and also gave her the child. It seems to me that there would not been enough room left on Hagar's shoulders for even and "infant".
Genesis 21:16 And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bowshot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept.
Genesis 21:17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is.
The scripture does not call Ishmael and infant, but a child and a lad. While it is true that a child can be an infant, I don't think you can get infant from lad. The only crying that seems to be going on is from Hagar's weeping, it does not say "the child lifted up his voice and wept" as our muslim friend claims. The scripture only records "the voice of the lad".
See Deu. 4:2, Rev. 22:18-19 about adding to God's word.

Deuteronomy 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
Revelation 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

If the above argument for Ishmael to be the heir to the covenant, instead of Isaac, is because Ishmael was to old to fit the description given in Gen. 21:14-21, then I submit that the only way to arrive at that conclusion, is to ignor the plain truth of the Bible.

I would like to also point out that our muslim friend neglected to tell us something very important about Ishmael that certainly "HAS IMPLICATIONS ON THE WAR AGAINST TERRORISM/ISLAM"
scince the Arabs are descendants of Ishmael. Genesis 16:11 is a prophetic verse pertaining to Ishmael and his descendants:

Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the LORD hath heard thy affliction.
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

Just think about that for a moment. Just because Abram and Sarai decided that God was going to need there help in getting the heir that God had promised him! Is mankind not still paying for that?

But, let's get back to Isaac vs Ishmael, what's done is done. The apostle Paul will help us clear up the issue on who is the real heir to God's covenant with Abraham:

Galatians 4:19 My little children, of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you,
Galatians 4:20 I desire to be present with you now, and to change my voice; for I stand in doubt of you.
Galatians 4:21 Tell me, ye that desire to be under the law, do ye not hear the law?
Galatians 4:22 For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.
Galatians 4:23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.
Galatians 4:24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar.
Galatians 4:25 For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.
Galatians 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Galatians 4:27 For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband.
Galatians 4:28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
Galatians 4:29 But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.
Galatians 4:30 Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.
Galatians 4:31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.

As for the Muslim position on who Jesus is, they seem to want to cherry pick some verses out of our bible to their liking.
They are happy to allow that He was a prophet, but not the Son of God as he claimed to be:
John 4:25 The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.
John 4:26 Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.

Allow me to include some other
relevant verses about who Jesus is:

Acts 3:22 For Moses truly said unto the fathers, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear in all things whatsoever he shall say unto you.
Acts 3:23 And it shall come to pass, that every soul, which will not hear that prophet, shall be destroyed from among the people.
Acts 3:24 Yea, and all the prophets from Samuel and those that follow after, as many as have spoken, have likewise foretold of these days.
Acts 3:25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed.
Acts 3:26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.

Posted by: Wayne at July 20, 2006 1:58 PM


» View All 19 Comments

» Post a Comment