Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Specter Hearts NSA Spying

specter_scary.jpgPatrick Radden Keefe originally wanted to call his examination of Sen. Arlen Specter's so-called "compromise" bill on NSA spying, "Don't Shit in my Hand and Call it a Sundae." His editors at Slate declined, alas. Luckily, they seem to have left Patrick alone for the rest of his analysis of Specter's 18-page legal ejecta. Here's a chunk:

Review by the FISA court is optional. Whereas under the 1978 law, the president could authorize surveillance without seeking a warrant for up to 15 days after a declaration of war, Specter's bill eliminates the declaration-of-war provision and expands that 15-day grace period — to a year.

And Specter is just getting warmed up. Toward the end of the bill, a few sly additions demonstrate that everything else, accommodating though it seemed, was mere preamble. Section 801 proposes to amend FISA by inserting the phrase, "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the constitutional authority of the President to collect intelligence with respect to foreign powers and agents of foreign powers." In other words, none of the constraints just outlined should be interpreted as absolute, because nothing in the preceding pages counts!

This provision, along with the accompanying suggestion that the president can find authorization to wiretap either through FISA or "under the Constitution," effectively codify the Bush administration's controversial argument that the president's authority as commander in chief under Article II of the Constitution gives him virtually unconstrained license to do whatever he sees fit, national-security-wise. According to this view, it's not the NSA surveillance program that's unconstitutional, but FISA itself. Critics have dubbed this the Article II on Steroids theory; and however much he puffs out his chest at the administration, it appears that Arlen Specter has become a subscriber. (emphasis mine)

Check out Ryan Singel's analysis, too.

Latest Comments

Ye Gods, did somebody open the Ark of the covenant or something? Nasty.

Posted by: Moose at July 20, 2006 1:49 PM


this is total bull crap he dosent deserve to be put away for what he did

Posted by: Kolin at July 20, 2006 9:30 AM


I don't think it's fair to call the support of about 50% of the population (according to most polls) "overwhelming support"....
That's like the old Bolshevik-Menshevik trick: the party whose platform lost by one vote at the convention got slapped with the label Mensheviks (minoritarians) and made to look like the out-of-touch reactionaries, while the more extreme party labeled themselves the Bolsheviks (majoritarians).
By which I don't mean to go around calling anyone a communist, just to point out that turning 50% into "overwhelming support" is a nasty rhetorical trick.

Posted by: Haninah at July 20, 2006 8:01 AM


I fail to see what is scary about the legislation given the information in the underlying DT post.

The NSA program has the overwhelming support of the American people. The only people I see opposing it are hard core privacy absolutists and their allies on the left who jumped this bandwagon as a way to take shots at Bush and his supposedly out-of-control imperial Presidency.

I don't think the executive has ever been weaker than it is now, with the whole mainstream media establishment actively undermining it coupled with their criminal leaker insider allies.

I wish I didn't have to draw that line with "liberals" but unfortunately the stark contrast is there. The US has enough enemies abroad to worry about without having liberals undermining our efforts to keep the country safe because they want to make the republicans/bush look bad.

Posted by: Kaltes at July 20, 2006 1:56 AM


Wait... are some of you actually supporting Specter's Bill? Say what you will about the (amusing) picture, but this is some sriously scary legislation. And why must everyone run around calling each other "Liberals" or "Conservatives" in a condescending manner? We are Americans, not Democrats or Republicans. It's fine to have an opinion one way or other on an issue, but it's another thing to take that view just because that's what your party tells you. It's also equally stupid to take a side just because your "political enemy" holds an opposing view. Use common sense and take the position that is good for the country.

Posted by: Joe091 at July 20, 2006 1:04 AM


» View All 9 Comments

» Post a Comment