The MiTEx Mystery: Mobile microsats make nerds nervous

Right now, a pair of mysterious, highly mobile microsatellites dubbed MiTEx are roaming about in geostationary orbit (GEO). Their mission and their capabilities are unknown; even their orbital position is classified. Lockheed Martin and Orbital Sciences each built one of the 225kg microsatellites for DARPA, and the Naval Research Lab built the propulsive upper stage.

mitex-stage.jpgInformation on the microsatellites themselves is virtually nonexistent. Calls by this office to DARPA were quickly met with “no comment”, and Space News writer Jeremy Singer’s inquiries also went unanswered. DARPA has already run the controversial DART and XSS-11 missions, both of which tested technology with anti-satellite applications. Since these missions were conducted largely within the public eye, one has to wonder what MiTEx is up to that must remain so secret.

The MiTEx launch, on June 18, was heralded by a press release touting its upper stage as a “technology demonstrator,” but this is where the story gets interesting. The upper stage is equipped with lightweight, high-capacity propellant tanks and with thrusters that use a platinum/rhodium alloy, which should be able to fire tens of thousands of times. It has solar panels and lithium-ion batteries to provide electrical power, as well as a star tracker. Compared to traditional upper stages – which consist of an unadorned solid-fuel rocket motor – this elaborate contraption of an upper stage is quite novel and is certainly designed to do a lot more than transfer the microsatellites from their transfer orbit to GEO.

But while such a tricked-out upper stage is unusual – only one other known upper stage, the Integrated Apogee Boost Subsystem (IABS), has even carried solar panels – every one of the individual technologies listed above is in itself tested and well-established. So what exactly are the technologies which this technology demonstrator is demonstrating?

The MiTEx satellites – about which no information is available – are freely traversing GEO with a robust upper stage that, based on launch vehicle performance, probably has plenty of fuel to spare for significant maneuvers. What exactly will they be doing in what has become the most economically viable and strategically important locale in space?

That is the million-dollar question. The high level of secrecy surrounding the satellites themselves, as well as the unusual upper stage, suggests that MiTEx might be more than a technology demonstrator. The fact that MiTEx effectively has stealth capability (only the U.S. Space Surveillance Network has a chance of detecting it) doesn’t help calm the nerves.

Close proximity operations around other satellites – as demonstrated by DART and XSS-11 – are certainly possible and would allow for a wide range of activities. For example, proximity operations would enable detailed reconnaissance of a satellite, identifying weaknesses, taking photographs, and collecting all the satellite’s incoming and outgoing radio traffic. More hostile acts, such as denying ground communications, depleting propellant reserves, and even causing permanent damage to the satellite, cannot be ruled out.

MiTEx could merely be demonstrating technologies that haven’t been tried before in the harsher GEO environment. Or it could indeed be operational, performing any number of possible clandestine missions. We simply do not know.

More information on MiTEx can be found at the World Security Institute’s Center for Defense Information. Ryan Caron is a research assistant for the space security project at the World Security Institute’s Center for Defense Information. He studies aerospace engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

14 Responses to “The MiTEx Mystery: Mobile microsats make nerds nervous”

  1. rutty says:

    “The fact that MiTEx effectively has stealth capability (only the U.S. Space Surveillance Network has a chance of detecting it) doesn’t help calm the nerves.”

    Who’s side on you on?

  2. FrontChi says:

    This story is reminiscent of the earlier ones about LES-8/9 and PROWLER, both stealthy, mobile GEOsats. LES-8/9 were survivable strategic comsat demonstrators and PROWLER is rumored to have been for sneaking up on Soviet satellites to check them out, possibly to exploit signals going to and from them.

  3. George says:

    As soon as the CIA learns what these are, we will find out through the NY Times.

  4. Ryan Caron says:

    Thank you for the LES and Prowler references. I will look into them further since as far as I knew MiTEx was the first for GEO.

    A clarification: The satellites are USA (in fact their desigations, including the upper stage, are USA 187,188,and 189). So I doubt the CIA is looking into this. NY Times, however, is a whole different story.

  5. g says:

    DART was a failed mission and didn’t prove prox ops techniques. Orbital Express, which launches this year, has a shot.

  6. Flea says:

    You know, I am as curious about this stuff as anybody. But following George’s CIA comment: Isn’t drawing attention to this stuff a bad idea? There is no reason to pre-empt the New York Times in doing our adversaries’ intel work for them.

  7. Eizu says:

    Don’t worry, MiTEx has been decommisioned…

  8. Ryan Caron says:

    The Yahoo News story previously linked makes no mention of MiTEx. Dead satellites in low orbits burn up all the time, and the presumed debris could easily be a meteorite. It is very unlikely that MiTEx has been decommissioned.

    MiTex was successfully placed into Geo-Transfer Orbit when it was launched by the Delta II rocket. From there, the NRL upper stage was to bring it to GEO. While this actual transfer to GEO is unconfirmed (the mission is indeed classified), it is assumed since such operation is fairly routine. Once you’re in GEO, you’re effectively there forever – there just isn’t enough propellant onboard to bring the satellite back down.

  9. Brian says:

    Uhh… no.

    It takes constant fuel use to stay in GEO. You can’t just sit there without firing thrusters every so often to maintain your position. Otherwise you fall.

    That’s why the “able to fire thrusters tens of thousands of times” in the article is important. It helps the thing stay where it’s supposed to be.

  10. Ryan Caron says:

    Fuel consumption in GEO is for “stationkeeping” because there are many small forces that can perturb the orbit, causing the satellite to drift out of its intended position. These effects are solar wind, the moon’s gravity, imperfections in Earth (it is not a perfect sphere) etc.

    If these forces were allowed to add up, the satellite would certainly not be where you wanted it to be, but it would remain up there in GEO. It would not fall per se.

  11. seedybee says:

    “Who’s side on you on?”

    Probably not the neo-fascist conservatists.

  12. Bob Chase says:

    Mind your own business and get a real job!!!

  13. ryan says:

    positionable spy sats…Duh!
    the ultimate spy tool.

Leave a Reply