Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

How We Let Osama Get Away

"We will prosecute these men and send a clear message to those who kill Americans: No matter how long it takes, we will find you and bring you to justice."

-- George W. Bush, 9/9/06

Five years ago tomorrow, three thousand people were killed in my home town. And the bastards who masterminded this mass murder have gotten away with it, thanks in part to the actions of our government and its allies. Sure, hunting for a single, clever man in a vast world is an extremely difficult task. It gets even harder, when there's anything less than 100% commitment and focus to catching him.

osama_dead_or_alive.jpgBy now, you probably know that Pakistan has signed a "truce" with the militants who many believe are harboring bin Laden. You know that the CIA has shut down its Osama-hunting shop. But what you may not know -- and what the Washington Post reveals today -- is that there hasn't been a "credible lead" on the Al-Qaeda chieftain's whereabouts in "more than two years. Nothing from the vast U.S. intelligence world -- no tips from informants, no snippets from electronic intercepts, no points on any satellite image -- has led them anywhere near the al-Qaeda leader."

In an exhaustive article, the paper shows how the trail for bin Laden grew so cold. The story starts not long after the President promised that the terrorist would be caught "dead or alive."

[In a December, 2001] videotape obtained by the CIA, bin Laden is seen confidently instructing his party how to dig holes in the ground to lie in undetected at night. A bomb dropped by a U.S. aircraft can be seen exploding in the distance. "We were there last night," bin Laden says without much concern in his voice...

Only two months later, Bush decided to pull out most of the special operations troops and their CIA counterparts in the paramilitary division that were leading the hunt for bin Laden in Afghanistan to prepare for war in Iraq...

Although the hunt for bin Laden has depended to a large extent on technology, until recently unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) were in short supply, especially when the war in Iraq became a priority in 2003...

Bureaucratic battles slowed down the hunt for bin Laden for the first two or three years... In early November 2002, for example, a CIA drone armed with a Hellfire missile killed a top al-Qaeda leader traveling through the Yemeni desert. About a week later, Rumsfeld expressed anger that it was the CIA, not the Defense Department, that had carried out the successful strike.

"How did they get the intel?" he demanded of the intelligence and other military personnel in a high-level meeting, recalled one person knowledgeable about the meeting.

Gen. Michael V. Hayden, then director of the National Security Agency and technically part of the Defense Department, said he had given it to them.

"Why aren't you giving it to us?" Rumsfeld wanted to know.

Hayden, according to this source, told Rumsfeld that the information-sharing mechanism with the CIA was working well. Rumsfeld said it would have to stop...

In 2004, Rumsfeld finally won the president's approval to put SOCOM [the Defense Department's Special Operations Command] in charge of the "Global War on Terrorism..."

Today, however, no one person is in charge of the overall hunt for bin Laden with the authority to direct covert CIA operations to collect intelligence and to dispatch JSOC [Joint Special Operations Command] units. Some counterterrorism officials find this absurd. "There's nobody in the United States government whose job it is to find Osama bin Laden!" one frustrated counterterrorism official shouted. "Nobody!"

The President and his team rightly deserve credit for deflecting any attacks on the homeland since 9/11. They deserve credit for catching Al-Qaeda bigwigs like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. But to let their hard-ons for Iraq and their petty infighting distract them from nailing America's number one enemy is more than frustrating. It's dangerous. They've shown would-be Osamas all over the world that you can attack America, and get off scot-free. And I'm afraid that more of my neighbors will one day pay the price for sending that awful message.

Latest Comments

FROM ARMY TANKER, TO LONG HAUL TRUCK DRIVER, FINALLY CONFINED TO A WHEELCHAIR, YOU GOT IT BABY I AM ALWAYS IN IT FOR THE LONG HAUL NOW SUCK IT UP, & DO YOUR DUTY DEFEND THIS NATION OR PERISH ,BIN LADEN HAS BEEN A FIGHTER FOR YEARS BUILDING AN ARMY OUR MILITARY IS BUILT IT JUST NEEDS TO BE TWEAKED A LITTLE REPAIRED A LITTLE,BUT UTMOST RESPECTED, HONORED AND HAVE THAT CAN DO SPIRIT! CONTINUE FOREVER THERE IS ALWAYS SOMEONE COMPLAINING ABOUT THE ARMY BUT IT IS A GOOD LIFE,SURE IT COULD BE BETTER,BUT YOUR SACRAFICES ARE MUCH APPRECIATED, THANK YOU GOD BLESS,MERRY CHRISTMAS

Posted by: Rick Mills at December 15, 2006 10:27 PM


Gen. Tommy Franks, Sec Def Rumsfiled and their staffs decided that using the locals, in concert with SOF and air power would be the quickest, cheapest, and most affective way to remove the Taliban from power. They studied the Soviet's methods and decided that a traditional large and heavy force would not work.

We wanted to remove the Taliban and kill every Al-Qaida we could find. Removing the Taliban requires one strategy, and killing all the Al-Qaida requires another. We chose the remove the Taliban strategy, and promote freedom and democracy. To kill every Al-Qaida we needed different tactics.

We could not have both strategies at the same time, and have to live with the consequences.
There is no right answer, and no one is to blame.

Posted by: BT at September 12, 2006 7:23 PM


WAT BOTHERED ME WAS OUR OUTSOURCING THE TASK OF TAKING TORA BORA BY FORCE. AFGHAN WARLORDS DO NOT WANT TO FIGHT, THEY THREATEN, POSTURE...AND NOTHING. WE GAVE HIM TIME TO MAKE HIS ESCAPE WHEN WE STOPPED THE PRESSURE. IF THE 10TH MOUNTAIN WAS THERE, SF FROM THE U.S., U.K., CANADA, AUSTRALIA, FRANCE, ROYAL DUTCH MARINES, U.S. MARINES, WE SHOULD HAVE WENT IN THERE HELLBENT FOR LEATHER KNOWING HE WAS THERE. WHO IS AT FAULT? GEN.HAGENBECK? OR HIGHER UPS? PART OF ME THINKS HE IS DEAD. OR JUST LYING LOW...WAITING...

Posted by: ROBERT BRYNE at September 12, 2006 10:24 AM


The comments to this post just go to show the huge advantage the Islamist terrorists have over us- our incredible ability to in-fight in the face of the biggest threat to our civilisation since the Cold War. As a number of people here point out, what's currently our weakest point is our collective resolve. The Islamofascists cannot defeat the US and allies militarily in Iraq, Afghanistan or in any other theatre- we can, however, let them win by not having the fortitude to continue to fight them.

Has the Bush administration made mistakes? Yes

Did the Clinton administration do enough to combat terrorism? No

Now, can we please move on and put a combined front on in the battle against terrorists who would like nothing more than to kill innocent civilians in vast numbers?

And, just for the record, Clinton didn't foil the Millennium terrorist plot as Aaron suggests; that was down to the actions of alert LEOs. The other plots hatched at the same time were defeated by Jordanian intelligence and the terrorists overloading and sinking their own boat. Clinton had exactly nothing to do with any of it.

Posted by: Jay.Mac at September 12, 2006 10:08 AM



Okay, the Atlanta Olympic bomber evaded capture for 5 years by hiding in the woods of Georgia, but somehow finding Osama in a foreign country in a desolate region is supposed to be a piece of cake, and thus represent the failings of the Bush administration.

The problem with the current so-called debate is the total lack of perspective and patience. Here we have Islamofascists who are committed to spending their entire lives fighting for their cause, no matter what the setbacks and hardships they face, and we Americans get into a frenzy of self-loathing because 5 years of anything is too long to wait.

Isn't it any wonder OBL is convinced the U.S. lacks the resolve, and all he has to do is wait for the Democrats to gain power and pull troops out of Iraq and suddenly make a triumphant appearance to claim victory for that?

Just think about this post and consider again why Osama and his gang consider the West to be weak. It's not about our weapons, folks. It's because it seems most of us slap "failure" on anything that doesn't produce instant gratification, and this post merely confirms how short-sighted and unwilling Americans are to see things through. Americans are only prepared to hardship and the long haul, as long as it's over by tomorrow.

Posted by: Paul at September 12, 2006 4:49 AM


» View All 22 Comments

» Post a Comment