Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

China's Killer Hovercraft

China is about to buy a six pack of heavily-armed hovercraft, Defense News reports. Sino-hawks here are already starting to freak out over the sale.

zubr-rv.jpg"A few years ago, the 'don’t worry, be happy' school of analysis of the PLA [People's Liberation Army] said that we should all be reassured that the PLA couldn’t attack Taiwan because it didn’t have enough hovercraft. Clearly, this is changing," University of Miami's June Teufel Dreyer tells the military trade.

The 540-ton Zubr LCAC, the world’s largest amphibious assault hovercraft, can reach speeds in excess of 60 knots, can travel 300 nautical miles and can shoulder various large loads: 130 tons of cargo, 500 troops, three 50-ton medium battle tanks, 10 BTR-70 armored personnel vehicles or eight BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicles.

"The Zubr will greatly enhance the PLA Navy’s capability to launch a large scale amphibious assault operation," Sinodefence.com observes.

At the moment the PLA has to rely on conventional landing ships for such an operation. The slow process for the troops and vehicles to swim from their carrier ships to the beachhead makes them highly vulnerable to enemy firepower. The LCAC’s ability to deliver troops, vehicles and cargos directly to the beach makes a huge advantage. China has developed several models of its own indigenous LCACs, but most of these are unarmed small designs carrying no more than 20 soldiers.

The deal to buy the hovercraft from Russia's Almaz Shipbuilding has been in the works for five years. And the initial order is teeny: just six ships. But "there are signs that China plans to build its own version of the Zubr-class craft," Defense News says.

"It could be that the Chinese want to test the vehicles or purchase a few and then begin... produc[ing] them in the PRC [People’s Republic of China]," Dreyer observes. "The amount ordered here, six, won’t be enough to mount an invasion. But it’s a start."

Latest Comments

Well im all for alternative weapon platform,I love those quirky Russian thangs! Mind you, everyone got apoint about China's copying quality, sur given enough time you can do it right, but the Chinese always seem to leave out the good bits, unlike the Russians stuff, which always have the good points. All well, if it has to take China to make my fatasy of a Armoured Assault Hovercraft Fighting Vehicle, then bring it on. I hope they spit on everyone, when they get going, next up should be the copying of the Ka-52 and the ekranoplanes Wing-In-Ground Effect transporters! GET IN THERE!

Posted by: Onizuka-GTO at October 23, 2006 12:15 PM


what would it take to sink one of these? an atgm seems to small.

Posted by: aaron at October 4, 2006 8:59 AM


There's an old saying from poker that applies here: "Money talks and bulls**t walks."

This is another indicator that the Chinese are serious about developing the ability to project combat power outside the mainland. These types of hovercraft are massive overkill for crossing rivers or even sizeable lakes. However, they would be very useful for amphibious operations against Taiwan, the Vietnamese coastline, the Spratly Islands, the Korean coastline, and perhaps even Japan or the Russian Far East coast.

Capabilities aren't the same thing as intentions. However, without the requisite capabilities, even the most hostile intentions will never be implemented. With the required capabilities, its just a matter of the Chinese leadership deciding to use them.

For those who say that the Chinese have purchased too few hovercraft to matter now: You are correct. Now. Real military power projection capabilities take many years to develop. The first step is always to buy/build the necessary equipment and field test prototype units using the equipment. The Chinese have taken the first step.

We'll find out over the next few years if the Chinese take the next steps to field substantial Army/Marine units built around the super hovercraft. If they do, it will be a strong indicator that we can expect "interesting times" in East Asia.

Posted by: James Jones at September 14, 2006 1:32 PM


I am not anti-China. I am anti-tyranny.

China is going to become the 1st or 2nd most powerful country on the planet no matter what we do. That is not in the least bit worrisome. Taiwan will probably eventually merge back into China no matter what happens.

But that does not mean that I oppose the US's full support of Taiwan. Quite the contrary.

The way Taiwan merges back into China is of the most importance. It must not be by conquest. If it is by conquest, it won't stop there. China is and has been formerly a major imperial power. A good portion of what we think of as China is actually an empire of conquered states. Think Tibet.

The problem with any country that suddenly increases in power goes through some sort of imperial phase. The US did it in the late 19th century, and for the same reason - extraordinary economic expansion and sudden emergence of real military power.

What's important about China is that there social advancement keeps pace with thier military and economic growth. If it does, China will sooner or latter be an important ally. If it doesn't, China will continue to be a dangerous restless place at best, and will be a dangerous enemy at worst. Right now there is alot of reason to think that the social and political growth is lagging the economic and military growth.

There is no way I would endorse the support of tyranny against a free country, no matter how convienent it may be. That way lies my own chains.

Posted by: celebrim at September 14, 2006 8:36 AM


China is not going to take over the world militarily. They are however on the move for resources. Could I call them free-market Communists? Think about Clyde Prestowitz’s “Three Billion New Capitalists.” Then we have Tom Freidman, but I can’t stand that guy, so no plug for him. :(

Read my other comments, Taiwan has to go if necessary to keep the peace between the US and China. I reject all historical arguments, because there are none. I've heard them all. An actual war, or cold war, or trade war between the US, China, and Japan would be the DUMBEST event in the history of the planet. The level of ignorance on China in DC is amazing. Thank goodness of Henry Paulson.

I think it is generational because I see people attempting to create a Cold War containment strategy for China. An attempt to isolate China will not work and will actually isolate the US.

China is going to be the most powerful nation is Asia regardless of what we do. If you are over the age of 40 then it is probably hard to accept the new paradigm. The distant future may not be the Americanization of the world like all the anti-globalists/multi-culturists fear, but “Chineseization” instead. Scary.

Islamic Jihadists are our enemy now, and for the next few decades. There are NO Chinese suicide bombers!

Posted by: BT at September 13, 2006 5:21 PM


» View All 19 Comments

» Post a Comment