Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Attack Of The Genius Robot Cockroach Swarm

I have seen some radical ideas for attacking deep bunkers, but this beats 'em all...

crawler.jpgHaving previously looked at Deep Digger and the Supercavitating penetrator, I was intrigued by an Air Force research Laboratory program called “Creative Robots to Defeat Deeply Buried Underground Targets” After finally getting clearance, I was able to interview Stephen Thaler of Imagination Engines Inc, the man behind the project. Thaler is evangelical about his brand of artificial intelligence, and the result is a piece in Wired News - "Experimental AI Powers Robot Army."

It’s quite a project. The idea is to develop software to make a collection of robots smart enough to break into, explore and neutralize deep bunkers. The challenges are gigantic.

The robots have to deal with an unspecified number of unknown obstacles as they travel via cable runs, air ducts, service pipes or other channels, dealing with grilles, bars, doors or other checks.

Then they need to correctly identify the target (waste bin, or WMD container?), which is easy for people but hard for robots – and this task requires being out of radio contact.

They have to act in concert and help rather than hinder each other, co-ordinating their efforts to explore and map the facility.

And all the time they have to be able to avoid, outwit or defeat the human defenders of the bunker, whose tactics, numbers and abilities cannot be predicted.

Thaler’s believes his software can do all this. It’s an unusual neural network with the ability to ‘dream up’ new ideas, exploring likely approaches before putting them into action. For example, give it a set of robotic limbs and it will quickly find the most effective way of using them – a video here shows a six-legged robot figuring out how to walk from scratch with no programming in eight minutes flat.

Imagination Engines’ capabilities also extend to sensors. Thaler describes products including a million-pixel array which can interpret input ‘an order of magnitude’ faster than any comparable system and another with formidable powers of recognition, such as distinguishing a T-72 from an Abrams. There is no programming involved: just show the system the two different objects and it figures out how to tell them apart.

The most guarded aspect of the Creative Robots is their tactical intelligence, which seems to be considerable – Thaler describes them as "Machiavellian" in how devious they can be. The Creativity Machine's ability to explore the entire range of possibilities means that in principle it could dream up any tactic that a human could, and more besides.

Within the next few months the software toolkit for Creative Robots will be available for the military. It will run on any standard hardware, turning a pack of dumb robots into smart team players capable of carrying out missions on their own. Thaler believes their speed makes Creative Robots superior to those that rely on human control, “performing at near-human levels of intelligence at Terahertz clock rates, while our joy-stick controlled robots are performing effectively at the 4 Hz clock rates characteristic of the brain.”

The possibilities for civilian use are tremendous. There are a vast number of ‘hard problems’ involved in getting robots to interact with the everyday world which require intelligence. Thaler believes that he has the solution. Look out for a host of commercial and industrial applications.

Dean Vieau, a consultant with many years of experience in the fields of Controls and Machine Vision, is an enthusiastic supporter. In one case study he carried out, Vieau found that a solution using Imagination Engines software was twenty times faster to develop and a hundred times cheaper than the existing approach.

“Imagination Engines represents a significant advancement in the realms of AI. Not just esoteric academic conjecture but real world paths to concrete results.”

As usual the military are developing world-changing technology that will filter down to the rest of us later. But are we really ready for killer robots yet?

“There is a reluctance to entrust lethal missions to autonomous robots,” says Thaler. “However, the bad guys may not share the same reservations. The escalation is inevitable.”

-- David Hambling

Latest Comments

Hmmm... any of you ever read the book "Prey" by Micheal Chrighton? Sound familiar?

Posted by: Leeman at January 31, 2007 1:00 PM


As the founder/operator of http://www.antimullah.com and also screenplay writer with a project called "History of the Future" I acknowledge the www.LindaSog.com post and link to this site a terrific find.

Whether my android/robotic fighters which develop over the next 3,000 years of future history or flesh eating locusts, as warrior or cleanup squads are all a figment of imagination they can be put to practical use.

Posted by: Alan Peters at October 1, 2006 2:48 PM


I find it strange that several posters just post ad hominem attacks on Stephen Thaler as opposed to actually taking the time to read what Dr. Thaler has published in peer reviewed journals. I have (for private enterprise) and the technology is a significant improvement in AI. The military is more open to trying unproven technologies than other large organizations so it's not surprising the Air Force is conducting tests. The fact that they have distributed follow on grants, is further evidence that it works.

Posted by: Gregg Dippold at September 21, 2006 8:44 AM



Dean Vieau does now work for IEI, but his comments preceded his employment. In effect, he like the product so much, he joined the company.

"We haven't seen any demonstrated ability here"

The Air Force have, and they sounded highly satisfied with its performance. Clearly the robot cockroaches are performing as required...which is quite awesome.

"But AI robots that plan and create new strategies? Yeah, right. "

Those are actually a lot easier than the perception and locomotion tasks. Computers have long been the masters at games of strategy.

"A machine that is infinitely adaptable is one that represents an infinite number of possibilities that things could go terribly wrong."

Very true. But someone will have these things soon even if the US does not - and as far as I can tell the best defence against a swarm of robots is another swarm of robots.

Posted by: David Hambling at September 20, 2006 11:16 AM


No, it doesn't scare the crap out of me. We haven't seen any demonstrated ability here. For all we know, even if these things could think or reason, they're just as likely to decide that attacking some terrorist is scary and they'd rather sit in an air duct, or watch TV, or that the best method to attack a terrorist is to jump into the trash can and deactivate themselves.

Posted by: Brian at September 18, 2006 1:23 PM


» View All 15 Comments

» Post a Comment