Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

"Plug-and-Play" Ship Hits the Water

Navy Captain Don Babcock was in a hurry, when I met him earlier this year, in his office, tucked in a red-brick battleship shell factory along the Potomac River. Most people is his position, running big military development programs, tend to think in deadlines of approximates: a funding decision will come some time in the next few weeks, a test will happen some time in the spring, a system will be fielded in fiscal year 2009 - or was that 2010? Babcock, on the other hand, had a big, digital clock on his wall, detailing the exact number of days, minutes, hours, and seconds until his first Littoral Combat Ship, or LCS, would be commissioned.

LCS_christening-6_thumb.jpgThe restless attitude seems to be paying off. The first LCS -- the "Freedom" -- was christened on Sunday. And that's a pretty major milestone for the Navy. Because the LCS is much, much different than anything in the American fleet today. Unlike the Navy's new DD(X) destroyer, the Freedom didn't cost billions to put together. And it's not planned for 1000 different kinds of missions, as a I noted in a Popular Mechanics article earlier this year:

Instead, each LCS will concentrate on a specific coastal mission: antisub warfare, mine clearance or ship-to-ship fights. Every LCS comes with a core crew of 40 and a weapons suite that includes a 57mm gun and missile interceptors. The boat is then customized with "mission modules" -- 40-ft. cargo containers, crammed with sonar arrays for sub-hunting, unmanned helicopters for surface warfare or robotic swimmers for minesweeping. The modules can be swapped out in less than a day. Then a second crew of about 35 comes on board to run the new machines. If the DD(X) is a 14,000-ton Swiss Army knife, then the LCS is a 3000-ton power drill-with interchangeable bits. "We're making a huge course change in the way we do business," Babcock says...

With a top speed of 45 knots or more, the LCSs will be fast enough to chase down terrorists in small boats. They're stealthy enough for effective reconnaissance. And, at about $400 million each, fully loaded -- about a tenth of the new destroyer's price -- the LCS is affordable enough for the Navy to send dozens of them skipping around the seas. It's a distributed, fast-moving response to a distributed, fast-moving foe.

Now, there a still a bunch of question marks surrounding the program. The basic shape, for instance. The Freedom looks like a speedboat on steriods. The second LCS, the Independence, will be a 419-foot trimaran. But the idea of building a cheap, adaptable, plug-and-play fleet that's future-proofed for uncertain times looks like a winner. And, unlike so many other Pentagon projects these days, the Littoral Combat Ship looks like it just might happen on time.

UPDATE 2:54 PM: Interesting: the Saudis want to buy the trimaran LCS... but with a stronger radar, and a whole lot more guns.

UPDATE 09/26/06 9:51 PM: Check out this sa-weeet video of the LCS being launched.

(Big ups: JH, TW)

Latest Comments

I came across this site, and was surprised to see the name don babcock, i was wondering if he was the same don babcock stationed at sigonella air station in 1986,whom i and my bandmates in a uk rock group called nitelife, made friends with ?, sorry to cut thru your topic, but i have fond memories of our time there and our other med tour stops !!, if that is you my friend, i am on steward187@btinternet.com thanks, terry

Posted by: Terry steward at December 8, 2006 7:46 PM


The LCS concept - modularizing ships to enable them to fulfill several different roles - seems very similar to what the Danish Navy developed fifteen years ago, as part of the general downsizing that happened everywhere in those days in order to reap the socalled peace dividend. This class was called the Flyvefisken (Flying Fish) class, or Standard Flex 300. More information can be found at

http://www.navalhistory.dk/English/TheShips/Classes/FlyvefiskenClass1989.htm

Ironically, the Danish navy has begun selling off this class in order to afford the purchase of larger units (similar to the ones that the SF-300 class superseded). The new class, however, is built up around the same "container" system as SF-300, enabling the continued use of the old containers, together with new ones such as the Long Range Air Defence unit.

The modularization idea is great - hopefully it won't be overloaded with too many far-off demands.

Regards,

Peter J. Pedersen

Posted by: Peter J. Pedersen at September 26, 2006 12:29 PM


Actually GD will launch their ship in December.

Posted by: JH at September 26, 2006 12:20 AM


I'll straighten this out.

Lockheed & General Dynamics are to build 2 ships EACH. And the Navy will pick which one is the "winner", and then make 50+ of that ship.

Congrats to Lockheed for there quick build time.
They started building there first LCS 11 months before GD...So we probably wont see the GD trimaran design on the water until summer 07'.

I favor the Tri-maran design. Its about time the Navy moves away from the conservative design monohull. The Trimaran design looks better, and is all around better. Its more stable in high seas, and has a bigger deck for helicopters and such.

Posted by: Murc at September 25, 2006 8:33 PM


Ok thanks. They will have 1 oddball duck after that.

Posted by: Mike at September 25, 2006 3:05 PM


» View All 7 Comments

» Post a Comment