Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Nuke Spaceship Docs Revealed

orion_arabic.jpgIn the late 1950's, the U.S. government began research into an interplanterary spacecraft that relied on nuclear detonations for propulsion. The effort, dubbed "Project Orion," died quietly ater a few years. But many of the documents surrounding the atomic spaceship have remained hidden or classified for more than four decades.

Boing Boing has a bunch of 'em up, now -- as well as an interview with tech historian George Dyson, who's dad worked on Orion. Check it out.

UPDATE 11:15 AM: "Orion is interesting from a military technology point of view, partly because it was literally a 'space battleship' with a large stock of nuclear warheads it could deliver anywhere on the planet," says David Hambling. "In particular, there is a program mentioned in [Dyson's] book called 'Casaba Howitzer' which is a nuke with highly directional blast, suitable for attacking buried installations etc. Casaba Howitzer is still, as far as I know, highly classified with no details anywhere."

Comments

Was the US edition of this book significantly different? Great fuss was made on boingboing about this being an Arab* translation with all sorts of classified pics in it, but as far as I can tell all the pictures are identical with the ones appearing in the UK edition.

*What, the Axis of Evil is going to build one of these to bomb the US or something? From layouts in a soft-back book?

Posted by: NelC at January 17, 2007 8:14 AM


There is an alternative to orion nuclear pulse
rockets for reaching all the planets of the solar system with our crewed expeditions. It is nuclear electric ion or plasma propulsion
rockets. The technology is similar to that used
in nuclear powered naval vessels except electric rocket engines will be used in place of electric engines turning propeller screws.This technology
has been around for 50 years already.
tim

Posted by: tim at November 3, 2006 8:13 PM


There is an alternative to orion nuclear pulse
rockets for reaching all the planets of the solar system with our crewed expeditions. It is nuclear electric ion or plasma rocket propulsion
rockets. The technology is similar to that used
in nuclear powered naval vessels except electric rocket engines will be used in place of electric engines turning propeller screws.
tim

Posted by: tim at November 3, 2006 8:09 PM



The piquantly Arabic-annotated picture of the Orion pulse unit in the new Flickr postings is, AFAIK, a demilitarized version of the Casaba-Howitzer nuclear shaped charge.

I did a quick look around this morning for C-H and found this interesting infobittie that indicates one application that was contemplated for it:

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/kennedyjf/viii/33843.htm

141. Summary Record of the 517th Meeting of the National Security Council/1/
Washington, September 12, 1963, 11 a.m.

[EXCERPTS]

/1/Source: Kennedy Library, National Security Files, Meetings and Memoranda Series, 517th NSC Meeting. Top Secret. Drafted by Smith. The 21 attendees at this meeting in the Cabinet Room included the President, Rusk, McNamara, Dillon, Robert Kennedy, Seaborg, McCone, Taylor, McGeorge Bundy, Sorensen, and eight members of the Net Evaluation Subcommittee headed by General Leon W. Johnson. (Ibid., President's Appointment Book)

Report of the Net Evaluation Subcommittee

General Taylor presented the Net Evaluation Subcommittee report/2/ and introduced General Leon Johnson, with the suggestion that the President might wish to question him about the report.

[snip]

Attachment/7/
/7/Top Secret.

RESUME OF DISCUSSION DURING NESC BRIEFING OF 12 SEPTEMBER 1963

Speaker--Gen. Johnson--Discussed the need for an effective ABM defense; emphasis on Laser and Casaba-Howitzer, intercepting sub-launched
missile in boost phase.

Posted by: Allen Thomson at October 18, 2006 5:32 PM


Orion never will be built and given the pollution and nuclear proliferation problems probably never should be built. But it is still a bit sad as it is the only technology that could possibly get us (have gotten us) out there to, say, Saturn with laboratory-sized payloads and crews (in 1965!). With luck another technology will be found some day, but not in my lifetime I bet.

Cranky

Posted by: Cranky Observer at October 18, 2006 3:35 PM


» Post a Comment