Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

"TIA" 2.0

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence is building a new terrorist profiling system, called Tangram. What's wrong with the old profiling systems, you might ask? Well, according to an unclassified document describing Tangram, they're not all that good at catching terrorists.

iaodarpa.jpgThe document, which is a description of the Tangram program for potential contractors, describes other, existing profiling and detection systems that haven't moved beyond so-called "guilt-by-association models," which link suspected terrorists to potential associates, but apparently don't tell analysts much about why those links are significant. Tangram wants to improve upon these methods, as well as investigate the effectiveness of other detection links such as "collective inferencing," which attempt to create suspicion scores of entire networks of people simultaneously.

Tangram's pedigree also is familiar. It is apparently the next generation of DARPA's Total Information Awareness system, which has been conducted in secret since Congress pulled public funding on the project in 2003. TIA programs form the foundation for Tangram, the document describing the system shows. (With one big difference: no privacy protections.)

Read the full story on Tangram in National Journal here.

-- Shane Harris

Comments

Notice the Third eye and the Pyramid in the IAO logo ? Yep it's " Them " all part of the " secret " but yet not so secret behind the visable system we live under.

Posted by: Observer at October 31, 2006 8:47 PM


Concluding the sum of each person in America who travels, makes a purchase or uses a phone to a "terrorism coefficient"? Sounds like a real winner to me....

Privacy issues are important, but I think we should be more concerned with the intelligence community's obsession with statistics and sifting databases. Our efforts to idiot-proof the intelligence gathering and analysis process are slowly turning our intelligence agencies into idiots.

You can't find a needle in a haystack by merely adding more hay.

Posted by: Robot Economist at October 20, 2006 11:23 PM


"under current US law" doesn't really matter anymore - as of the last week or so, if you wish to press the issue of something's legality or Constitutionality, the President can declare you an enemy combatant because you're interfering with the War on Terror, and stash you someplace for a *long* time.

Posted by: Valdis Kletnieks at October 20, 2006 2:39 PM


Good Morning Folks,

An interesting idea but under current U.S. law it wouldn't be very effective, I'm afraid.

A better system of Airport Security would be to issue every passenger and their luggage an RFID, it would simply be printed on both the boarding pass and luggage check. Doing this would be simple enough at the check in counter. The printing of RFID's is no longer a big deal.

This tagging would allow the TSA to track every passenger and their bags while on the secure side of every airport that they would be in for their entire trip. If a passenger gets off their flight at the wrong airport red flags would go up the instant they left the secured area.

If the goal is to increase security while at the same time controling costs this may very well be the method of garding our airports. Any privacy issues are basicly a wash with other security measures already in place.

ALLONS,
Byron Skinner

Posted by: Byron Skinner at October 20, 2006 2:01 PM


» Post a Comment