Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Mind Control, Prisoner Experiment Okays

clockwork_orange_small.jpgHeads up, Navy scientists! If you want to perform "severe or unusual intrusions, either physical or psychological, on human subjects," you're going to need approval from the Under Secretary of the Navy.

According to a memo unearthed by Secrecy News, that goes for "consciousness-altering drugs or mind-control techniques," as well. Ditto for experiments on "prisoners" -- even though the document says earlier that "research involving any person captured, detained, held, or otherwise under the control of DoD personnel (military and civilian, or contractor employee) is prohibited." The UNDERSECNAV's thumbs-up is also required for human trials involving "potentially or inherently controversial topics (such as those likely to attract significant media coverage or that might invite challenge by interest groups)."

On the other hand, the Director of Defense Research and Engineering makes the call on "all proposed research involving exposure of human subjects to the effects of nuclear, biological or chemical warfare agents or weapons."

So keep that in mind.

Comments

Just to be clear about the human exposure to CBRN hazards, the official policy guidance is "don't." It's reported upon annually to Congress, and there have been no tests of CBRN hazards on humans since 1975.

Posted by: Jason at December 4, 2006 3:13 PM


Grumpy:

My research indicates that the legal status of the Nuremburg Code as an inviolable international law is questionable. At best, it only assuredly is enforceable where it has been enacted by a legislature of the appropriate jurisdiction. As far as I know, some US states have done so, but the federal US Congress has not.

Perhaps you'd care to point out evidence indicating (a) this automatic death penalty you reference, and (b) the applicability and enforceability of the Code to US military and federal government officials.

Posted by: Rumor at December 1, 2006 11:24 PM


Do yourself a favor, do a little research. Look up the term, "Nuremburg Code". This is the international agreement on human experimentation. The United States played a major role in its creation and implimentation. There are ten tenets of this code. You must meet all of them. Failure is a war crime punishable up to death by hanging. There is no "plausible deniability", up and down the chain of command. This would also include the Commander and Chief. There are no laws which Congress can write to circumvent this code. Anyone who gives counsel, with the purpose of circumventing this code can also dance at end of that very same rope. Just something to ponder, Grumpy

Posted by: Grumpy at December 1, 2006 2:41 PM


I guess it could be worse. I suppose we should be both proud and happy that the navy has an official accountability policy on this kind of thing. I wonder what those without a policy must have to deal with. Kind of like requiring those that would like to commit murder to get a pardon from the governor first.

Posted by: sailfast at December 1, 2006 1:34 PM


*shiver*

Posted by: mrnitropb at December 1, 2006 1:13 PM


» Post a Comment