Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Broken Gear, Piling Up

The Washington Post has a fascinating report from the Anniston Army Depot, where "sprawling lots of tanks and other armored vehicles are just the start of a huge backlog" of gear broken by Iraq and Afghanistan.
061204_anniston_depot_hmed_10p.hmedium.jpg

"There's stuff, stuff everywhere," Joan Gustafson, a depot official, said as she wheeled her brown Chevrolet van through a landscape of rolling hills lined with armadas of mobile guns.

"There's another field of M1s," she said, motioning toward a swath of M1A1 Abrams tanks next to the winding road. "We're just waiting for someone to tell us what to do with them..."

Equipment shipped back from Iraq is stacking up at all the Army depots: More than 530 M1 tanks, 220 M88 wreckers and 160 M113 armored personnel carriers are sitting at Anniston. The Red River Army Depot in Texas has 700 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and 450 heavy and medium-weight trucks, while more than 1,000 Humvees are awaiting repair at the Letterkenny Army Depot in Pennsylvania.

Despite the work piling up, the Army's depots have been operating at about half their capacity because of a lack of funding for repairs. In the spring, a funding gap caused Anniston and other depots to lose about a month's worth of work...

Responding to urgent requests from the Army and Marine Corps, Congress approved an extra $23.8 billion in October to replace worn-out equipment in fiscal 2007. With the money, the Army plans to double the workload at its depots, which will repair and upgrade 130,000 pieces in 2007, up from 63,000 last year. This will include a quadrupling of the number of tanks, Bradleys and other tracked vehicles overhauled, from 1,000 to 4,000.

At Anniston, which will handle 1,800 combat vehicles in fiscal 2007, a cavernous 250,000-square-foot repair shop is humming as damaged tanks are rolled in one by one and disassembled with the help of giant cranes. Removing an M1 tank's turret alone takes a day and a half, and the entire overhaul requires 54 days and costs about $1 million, said Ted A. Law, the depot's vehicle manager.

Earnest Linn, 58, a heavy-mobile-equipment mechanic who as of January will have worked at Anniston for 30 years, said that "it's never been like this" since the end of the Vietnam War.

Latest Comments

The reason why all the broken machines are broken is due to the 10 years of draw down and peace dividend used to fund the 1992-1999 President legacy. The build up used all of the funds since 2000 to upgrade the forces and train those that are fighting now. War is ugly and to outsource repairing these systems is criminal, not just Politically correct.

Posted by: Robert W Stone at December 20, 2006 7:30 PM


the "college educated grunt" on 17 Dec hit an interesting point. He said our enemies could wait 30-45 days when our equipment breaks down, then plow over us. Looks good on paper. But didn't the Soviet plan on tanks, make them cheap, and build 4 for our one. Then our one could take out three of theirs, before their fourth got us. Also a great plan, but where is the Soviet block today?
Would many of our repair people be interested in deploying to Iraq for 6-10 months set up a factory and do the repairs there. Make sense for money reasons, but would also make a great target for would-be bombers.

Posted by: Jim at December 20, 2006 7:25 PM


In reading these comments, the wonderful grammar aside, does anyone remember anything about "transformation?" Many of the units that owned these tanks now walk or ride in Strykers. This depot is now the "home for misfit toys."

Totally agree with the BRAC statement.

Posted by: Just a Joe at December 18, 2006 2:59 PM


he point you are missing is that the BRAC in it's infinite wisdom decided to "scale" back Red River Army Depot in Texarkana and turn over all rebuilds to civilain companies. When this Depot was run by the Army, their turnaround time for all sizes and types of vehicles was fantastic. BRAC decided everything would be done at Anniston and guess what, they cannot keep up. Let's see, we cut the military to the bone, then we close the depots that do great work, overload the others, and then we can't figure out why we don't have what we need to fight a war. Looks like the "Peace Initiative" did not work out as expected.

Posted by: Gunny Joe at December 18, 2006 10:13 AM


The main reason we have to send all the way back our damaged fighting vehicles from Iraq is that we do not have any allies to host our repair or rehabilitations stations in their soils. We claimed at first that these operational adjecent countries fully supported US efforts in Iraq but the truth is that these fuedal led states are not supported by their own people and they only interest is to isolate these war effort from their peoples. Any workshops and forward repair bases established within their soils will be notified by their own officils to the insurgents groups operating in the vicinity. The insurgents then will blow everything up the sky those heavy machines of war. We have to resort to these expensive and ineffective logistic supply lines due to the war we are slogging in now are in actual facts stupid war.

Posted by: salute3 at December 18, 2006 1:11 AM


» View All 29 Comments

» Post a Comment