Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

New Camera Sees In Bullet Time

Here's your cool gadget of the week: a video camera that can follow speeding bullets midflight. I took a look at the gizmo, built by Nova Sensors Inc for the Air Force Research Laboratory, for Wired News. I've examined Nova's goods before. But this is the first time it's ability to mimic the Matrix's bullet time sequences has been revealed.

FlashAndBullet2.jpgThe first videos -- which you can see via the Wired story -- are crude. But it's an impressive capability. Existing sniper-finding systems rely on radar or acoustic sensors. And they can be heavy, bulky, and are one more piece of kit to carry. Nova Sensors device (known as VAST) can be integrated into a thermal imager, devices which are small enough for personal use.

Effectively, it could turn every round into a tracer bullet. Anyone firing at you would give themselves away immediately, even if the muzzle flash is hidden. From Nova President Mark Massie’s comments on the sensor, it sounds as though different types of rounds may have very different signatures, so enhanced software would not only be able to pinpoint the source of a shot, it could say what type of weapon is being fired. A system that tells you that two AK-47s and one AK-74 are firing from the upper story of Building A? Sounds pretty useful.

Interestingly, right at the moment a new evaluation is being carried out using ShotSpotter acoustic sniper location system in conjunction with Boeing's ScanEagle UAVs. The idea is that the ShotSpotter indicates the location and Scan Eagle goes over to get a better look. A ScanEagle equipped with the VAST camera system would be a logical extension of this idea.

(The bad guys could try to get around it by using bullets cast from ice when they are sniping, an approach only used so far in bad thrillers as far as I know. It's possible; it gives terrible ballistics and very limited lethality, but the bullets could not be tracked by the VAST system. Or at least, not until Massie's team spend five minutes on the software and get it to pick out cold objects against the warm background as well as hot ones.)

If only Zapruder had had one of these, we would be able to see exactly how many bullets were fired at Kennedy and from what direction...

There are likely to be a lot of other applications which are more prosaic than following bullets in flight. But as a first demonstration, it’s pretty impressive.

-- David Hambling

Latest Comments


LAW: "The camera tracks with radar and sound"

NO - it tracks using the infrared image. It does not use radar or sound like previous systems.

The ice bullets comment was flippant, but I suspect it could be done if approached correctly. You can't simply use a bullet-shaped mould: the ice crystals have to be structured correctly for the forces involved.

Even a saboted round heats up significantly: travelling at sea level at mach 4 is going to create a lot of friction heating.

Lidar is nice, but this has the advantage that it's not an extra (expensive) piece of kit, it can be integrated into night vision systems.

Posted by: David Hambling at February 10, 2007 11:26 AM


Video is passive and requires some detection scheme to determine that an object is traveling through the "videospace." Traditionally and wrt physics, active detectors which transmit and collect returns have been the most effective sensors. There is in development, a LIDAR sniper detector which will do the same job- or nearly the same job. The optimum would probably be to combine both systems to provide multi-spectral redundancy, take advantage of existing algorithms already developed or in development for each spectrum. One sensor type is not going to meet the
requirements for certainty and speed of detection.

Posted by: Xshipdriver at February 9, 2007 10:40 PM


With reference to the Zapruder film the bullets are not able to be seen. Photographic film depends on granules of chemicals (silver nitrite) and has a grainy appearance at high magnification. A bullet against the background in the film would be smaller than the grain of the film and so is invisible. Not to mention the inablity of standard film to capture an image of an object moving at a 1000 fps.

Posted by: GM Fedorchuk at February 9, 2007 10:02 PM


So what we have is digital interface equipment software that is compatible for bullet or sniper recognition and shrapnel as well & also analyzing for facial recognition scanning: that is - - -using advanced algorithms on regular cams, heat detection cams, night vision cams all on a low frequency & low bandwidth space . It's power resourcing is is minimal for onboard for re-chargable ni-cad batteries. This seems optimal for using it on any military vehicle. It seems to have potential to predict snipers locale and either repot it or fire on all uav vehicles. The eagle eyes technology is imaging that localizes on movement as well nad not just temperature variations. The question is where does the manned control decide when the movement is threat as civilian or military as "threat to fire" authorization is acqired. Don't we need a land device to get 2nd opinions? Unmanned planes uav equate to replacements on old binoculars and scope bombers back in ww 11. Unmanned tanks or jeeps equate to replacing the common soldier with feild scopes confirming a artillery quadrant hit after firing solution or a bomb from a plane in an ordered air strike. This is the newer battlefield in a new 2000 era. Something that is jsut never heard of on the 1900's. Only heard of it in sfi-fi moovies. The eagle-eye technology needs to be integrated into land based vehicles as well. 1 kilometer of tracking a bullet as it fires is enough time to allow the vehicle to smart adjust, if the land based vehicle has enough torque and is running optimal, to the bullet aimed at it so where as the air filled baggie may not be even necesary.

Posted by: Max Anderson at February 9, 2007 9:25 PM


George's comment about the Zapruder film containing bullets is probably accurate, but the film would only contan the image of the bullets, not the heat signatures so Im going to say that the JFK cover-up is still safe.

Posted by: Send me back.. at February 9, 2007 5:24 PM


» View All 19 Comments

» Post a Comment