Nork Nuke Deal: Back to the Future?
Great news. According to the Times, "The United States and four other nations reached a tentative agreement to provide North Korea with roughly $400 million in fuel oil and aid, in return for the North’s starting to disable its nuclear facilities and allowing nuclear inspectors back into the country."
But here's the weird thing. "We almost certainly could have gotten this deal before the North Koreans tested a missile and a nuke," the Arms Control Association's Paul Kerr notes. In a way, I agree with this statement from John Bolton:"
This is the same thing that the State Department was prepared to do six years ago. If we going to cut this deal now, it’s amazing we didn’t cut it back then.
Not that the deal is entirely set. As Slate observes, "any agreement with North Korea should be met with some skepticism because the country has changed its mind in the past, and leader Kim Jong-il still has to give his blessing."
It's a win for peace, diplomacy, and Kim. It's a loss for the warmongers and idealists. I doubt this deal will work for more than 12 months. It doesn't help the DPRK's people and keeps Kim in power, so it's a loser. It's good PR for the US and maybe China.
The world hates US unilateralism, so I hope they are happy; I doubt it, they always complain about something. The US has no appetite for actually solving problems, so we are back to the Realist foreign policy. The "kick the can" game continues.
Posted by: BT at February 13, 2007 6:18 PM