Got a tip for Noah?
SEND IT!
(Guaranteed Confidential)
Subscribe

Subscribe via RSS

Archives by Date
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

See all Archives
Archives by Category
'Canes
Ammo and Munitions
Armor
Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
Bizarro
Blimps
Blog Bidness
Bomb Squad
Cammo Green
Chem-Bio
Cloak and Dagger
Comms
Cops and Robbers
Data Diving
Dissent Tech
Drones
Eat My Dust
Eye on China
FCS Watch
FOS Files
Gadgets and Gear
Ground Vehicles
Guns
Homeland Security
Info War
Iraq Diary
Lasers and Ray Guns
Less-lethal
Logistics
Los Alamos and Labs
Medic!
Mercs
Missiles
Money Money Money
Net-Centric
Nukes
Planes, Copters, Blimps
Politricks
Rapid Fire
Raptor Watch
Red Team
Retro-Futuro
Roll Your Own
Sabra Tech
Ships and Subs
Space
Strategery
Terror Tech
The Deadlies
Those Nutty Norks
Training and Sims
War Update
You can run...

See all Archives
Related Links
News and Intel
Military.com News
Aviation Week
Natl Defense Mag
Strategy Page
Global Security Newswire
Soldiers for the Truth
Security News
Defense Review
Fed Comp Week

Security Sources
GlobalSecurity.Org
Fed Am Sci
CSIS
Ctr for Defense Info
Defense & Natl Interest
Instit for Sci & Intl Secy
Secrecy News
POGO
Cryptome
The Memory Hole
Natl Security Archive

Geeks and Mad Scientists
Slashdot
Wired News
Security Focus
The Register
Gizmodo
Geek Press
Robots.Net
Cosmic Log
Space Daily
New Scientist
TechCentralStation
Engadget
Space.Com
Technology Review
Gyre
Near Near Future
Fed Dev Blog

Bloggers and Buddies
Phil Carter
Global Guerillas
Jeffrey Lewis
Milblogging
OPFOR
Laura Rozen
Larisa Alexandrovna
Juan Cole
Ryan Singel
Josh Marshall
Cursor
Boing Boing
InstaPundit
Winds of Change
Tapped
TalkLeft
Brad DeLong
Mountain Runner
Gene Healy
Clive Thompson
Greg Djerejian
Jeff Quinton
Workbench
Electrolite
Jim Henley
War in Context
Kathryn Cramer
Wash Park Prophet
Blogs of War
Tom Shachtman

Official Dispatches
DARPA
AF Research Lab
Marine War Lab
Soldier Systems Ctr
Naval Research
Army Research Lab
UK Def Sci Lab
NASA News
DoJ Cybercrime

Military Network
Military Benefits
Veteran Employment
GI Bill Express
Personnel Locator
Free ASVAB
The Few
Fred's Place
Army Insider
Navy Insider
Air Force Insider
Marine Corps Insider
Coast Guard Insider



Edited by Noah Shachtman | Contact

Navy Grows Land Forces

With the Army and Marine Corps stretched to breaking in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Navy is scrambling for ways to contribute more to inland fights. One result is a new river boat squadron, second of its type, stood up two weeks ago. Riverine Squadron Two and its sister, Ron One, are part of Navy Expeditionary Combat Command, which gathers all the Navy's coastal and land forces under one banner and adds brand new capabilities.

NECC -- based alongside patrol boats (pics!) and amphibious ships at Little Creek, Virginia -- includes construction battalions, logistics troops, harbor patrol units, ordnance disposal teams and the new riverine squadrons, and is the subject of a story in the current issue of Defense Technology International.

"It was definitely the ongoing war that created the idea," says Captain Robert McKenna, NECC's 44-year-old training officer. "We realized that the Army and Marine Corps were nearing capacity and that there was more to be done. We were looking for ways for the Navy to contribute more. Then we started looking out and said, the Navy really is contributing. And the sailors contributing the most in theater are the ones wearing this uniform."

He gestures to his green and brown fatigues, the same ones worn by the Navy's 16,000 Seabees, 3,000 port cargo handlers and hundreds of Explosive Ordnance Disposal experts -- all of whom have been busy abroad in recent years. "They had no type command that took care of their Title X functions: training, equipping, manning."

"We saw a need to put them into a coherent structure and better equip them," adds NECC commander Rear Admiral Donald Bullard, 55. "And then, all of the sudden, we began to look at other capabilities" including Navy civil affairs and riverine.

Riverine forces in nimble, heavily-armed boats played a huge role in the Vietnam War, but were run down after the evacuation of that country as the Navy shifted focus on deterring the Soviet Navy. In Iraq, a country crisscrossed by large rivers, canals and marshes, the U.S. and British militaries (pictured) found themselves chasing down waterborne smugglers and insurgents in jerry-rigged engineer boats until specialized forces could be reconstituted.

The U.S. Marines sent its new boats to patrol Haditha Dam, a major power-generating station in western Iraq, but wasn't happy diverting money and resources to a mission that once belonged to the Navy. By 2005, the Corps was ready to divest itself of the riverine mission. Then-Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Vern Clark sensed this.

"Admiral Clark asked, Marines how can I help?" explains Lieutenant Commander Mike Egan, 44-year-old commander of Riverine Squadron One. "One of the ways was, hey, this riverine mission thing. That was the impetus that got the whole riverine thing rolling.”

NECC will have three squadrons, each with 224 sailors and, eventually, a combination of 39-foot Small Unit Riverine Craft, built by Raytheon, and smaller Special Operations Craft-Riverine, built by United States Marine. “The goal is to get 16 boats per squadron," says Ron One's Lieutenant Chris Cowart, 40. The total includes eight SURCs and at least four SOC-Rs. "The balance could be either."

Until enough boats are manufactured, the Navy is borrowing SURCs from the Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, for training and plans to fall in on the Corps' boats at Haditha Dam when it first deploys a squadron to Iraq in 2007. Their mission in Iraq will be much like the Marines', patrolling waterways, landing Marines and Masters at Arms for raids or riverbank security, searching small boats to interdict insurgents and illegal weapons.

While the missions and platforms are the same, the Navy is adding high-tech capabilities to its riverine squadrons that the Marines have lacked. In addition to the usual bank of radios, Navy SURCs will feature digital network terminals in order to plug into the Army's command and control architecture. And, according to Lieutenant Christopher Farricker from Riverine Group One, the Navy is shopping for a small UAV that can boost a four-boat patrol's situational awareness. The idea, he says, is to get that "bird's eye view and give it back to the boat operator." The service hasn't down-selected types yet.

--David Axe, cross-posted at War Is Boring

Latest Comments

This is not a well thought out idea.
It is no more the the river/marine type forces we had in Nam and is less then the pt boat squadrons of WWII.
These types of forces should be supported by
helicopters ala HAL-3. *Helicopter Attack Squadron 3 or airplanes like a PBY.

Posted by: Aviator&Sergeant at November 2, 2007 9:32 AM


This mission has to be done, and it's pretty clear that neither the Army nor the Marines want nor need the distraction of keeping armed "holes in the water" afloat, which the Navy has the most experience doing, going back to the Revolutionary War. Defending against attacks from the shore in Iraq will be similar to what it took in Vietnam, and anyone whom has tried to hit a boat/ship moving at any kind of speed on the water will tell you it's just not that easy, especially if the waterway is wider than 100 feet, providing enough maneuvering room. The amount of firepower and ammo that can be carried on even the smallest rigid-hulled boat is a whole lot more than a typical rag-tag group on land only equipped man-served/portable weapons. If you get close enough to accurately target a boat, you're going to be at a severe disadvantage as soon as you fire your first round (which will likely be so much of a miss that it won't even hit the broad side of the boat if your only experience is against Humvees driving down narrow streets). Ask the few Viet Cong still alive after they were stupid enough to shoot at Navy boats what it's like to get .50 caliber, or better, return fire in high quantities from multiple mounts, usually from multiple boats. IEDs are a lot harder to position along waterways against boats than against vehicles on much more constrained roads. Once the waterway is more than a couple of hundred yards wide, range and maneuverability make penetration and targeting just about impossible using man-portable weapons. As for accurately laying mines in water, that's even harder than hitting a moving boat with a gun, especially if the water is moving at any kind of speed, especially if you don't know what you're doing (and the folks in that part of the world are notoriously not very fond of getting out on the water - dhow drivers only do that because they can't figure out how to make a living on land).

As they say, "Go Navy!"

All the Best,
Joe Blow

Posted by: Joe Blow at February 20, 2007 3:06 AM


Wish I did not retire, I would be all over that mission!

Posted by: DanielJRioux at February 19, 2007 11:49 AM


The vessel hides with speed. Even a skilled sniper is going to have real trouble hitting a fast, erratic target on the water at normal sniper engagement range.

Mass AK fire is a problem.

Aircraft hide behind speed as well, but then you have this damn new SAM threat. And the fact that pilots tend to love their schedules. Insurgents love schedules too.

There's no system out there that can survive IED strikes or direct hits from mortars. Even an up-armored humvee will get blown to heck by RPG-7s and 14.7mm.

The thing is, if everyone and their neighbor is throwing ordnance at you, you are not in control of the country. To gain control, you can convince them to stop shooting or you can kill them all. Our forces do not have the resources to do the former, and we can not conscience them doing the latter. And thus things remain.

Posted by: Arcturus at February 18, 2007 4:55 PM


Hey, go for it Navy. Way back when, before SEALS, worked with a UDT team. They did their gig, we did ours. The SeaBees, constuction, did a fantastic job. We were not trained to be carpenters or such. We were trained to demolish things, in a different sort of way.

Semper Fi Navy.

Posted by: H.J. Brewer at February 18, 2007 2:50 PM


» View All 14 Comments

» Post a Comment