For many years, national security experts, prominent scientists, and probably Dennis Kucinich, have received hundreds of e-mails that begin something like this: “I am surveilled, harassed and gangstalked everywhere I go 24/7/365.”
I’ve certainly received them, and Defense Tech has gotten its fair share, too.
The letters typically state that the person is a victim of an organized mind control plot that involves weapons that beam voices into their head; shoot powerful pain rays at them; and often includes around-the-clock harassment and monitoring. One of the common claims is that the people are targeted by microwave weapons.
What do most people do with these letters? Defense writer William Arkin says he hits the “delete” button when he gets those e-mails. Jon Ronson, author of the wonderfully wacky Men Who Stare at Goats has stated that mind control is an area that he doesn’t “want to get into.” (This from a gifted writer who interviewed a man who believes the world’s leaders are extraterrestrial lizards in disguise.)
What do I do with these letters? I read them, and this Sunday’s Washington Post Magazine has a cover story based on my nearly year-long investigation into their claims.
I try to raise what I think are some fascinating questions about the Pentagon’s involvement in microwave weapons and the auditory effect (which could be used to send sounds or voices into people’s heads).
As for whether there’s any evidence that hundreds, if not thousands of people, are being targeted by microwave weapons, well, read for yourself.
P.S. You might also want to reread David Hambling’s fascinating take of recent bio-electromagnetic weapon work here.
I don’t believe there are any mindcontrol tools, except for what has been used for long periouds time – propaganda.
There might however be massive systems of mind control in the future:
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/20/1026898931815.html
I get those letters, too. The very first troll I ever had to ban on my blog (in 2003?) was a guy out of Korea who kept posting in my comment section about remote neural monitoriing. (He changed IP#s a couple of times so he could keep it up.)
Mind control? I’d have to doubt the government’s expertise in that area. Likely the private sector is where you want to look for examples. Test consumers in special MRI machines subjected to audio visual data to interpret and fine tune their responses to certain sounds and images and combinations thereof, leading towards more and more effective advertising.
Look around, there seems no end to how much people will buy truly useless products. Entire industries are built and perpetuated on things that really have no place in this world outside of a landfill.
I read the first such letter I got, and the second, but these days I just delete them.
As time goes on, Nancy Luft will be seen less as a joke and more as a prophet.
I hope Area 51 crap, UFOs, and all the X file tinfoil quality science fiction are considered worth a delete too. It’s not worth to be categorized as military related, and showing up on Defense Tech. It challenges the credibility of such military analysis those who are serious in such X-files, and looks really bad in the eyes of the people. If I was a military analysis, I wouldn’t, or I guess I would lose my job and credibility. No thanks to tin foil hat stuff. I am glad that someone does delete such e-mails.
“I hope Area 51 crap, UFOs, and all the X file tinfoil quality science fiction are considered worth a delete too”
- well, Area 51 is a real facility where real airraft like the U-2 and F-117A were developed.
And UFO reports turn out to contain some useful information about classified aircraft.
Delete them all, and you lose out. The trick is to try and sift the wheat from the chaff, as Sharon shows in her article. If you think that the Pentagon is not active in this area, then you haven’t been paying attention.
Recently Jonathan D. Moreno wrote Mind Wars, a book reviewed by Nature magazine and he wrote of the thousands of alleged mind control victims that contacted him as a result of his 1999 book on secret state experiments. In this heightened national security era, I thank you Sharon Weinberger again for raising an issue that is rarely discussed but should be. Please see http://www.mindjustice.org for EMR weapons facts and history. My work has been cited by the UN, Scientific American, Dr. Moreno etc. Please research the topic of EMF weapons and mind control !!! Sincerely, Cheryl Welsh, director
of Mind Justice.org
Good work, Sharon Weinberger, with the Washington Post magazine article drawing attention to the suffering of thousands.
And cheers for the steady, high quality work of Cheryl Welsh at mindjustice.org, arranging translations of foreign data, gathering experts, and lending a hand to many weakened and (maybe)sometimes confused victims.
There is no doubt that thousands of people worldwide are indeed victims of technology that hasn’t yet been admitted to the public.
Who is using it? That is the question.
Raytheon’s Silent Guardian technology closely resembles the symptoms many targets of electronic harassment report. Sadly, this real technology was not mentioned in Sharon Weinberger’s Mind Control article.
Google Raytheon Silent Guardian to get specific product descriptions.
By making fun of the Tin Foil Hat Brigade we ignore a very real threat to our freedom, or futures and our families.
See http://ElectronicElephants.com for more information.
Many thanks for all you do!
Target at Electronic Elephants dot com
STOP BIO-PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS TORTURE BRAINMIND CONTROL SLAVERY
ASSASSINATION!!!
Dear Sir/Madam,
“The Nuremberg Code (1947)â€:
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/
“… the Nuremberg Code …â€:
http://www.nihtraining.com/ohsrsite/guidelines/nuremberg.html
http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/Nuremberg_Code.htm
http://www.ushmm.org/research/doctors/code_expl.htm
http://www.aches-mc.org/nurm.htm
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/references/nurcode.htm
— —
“Istanbul Protocolâ€:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_Protocol
— —
“ “The Istanbul Protocol”
The Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment “:
http://www.phrusa.org/research/istanbul_protocol/
http://www.harpweb.org.uk/external.php?url=http://www.phrusa.org/research/istanbul_protocol/&harpid=1339
— —
“Istanbul Protocol
The Manual on Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Psychological Evidence of Torture
Torture
A. General Considerations
1. Central Role of the Psychological Evaluation “:
…
“…Perpetrators often attempt to justify their acts of torture and ill-treatment by the need to gather information. Such conceptualizations obscure the purpose of torture and its intended consequences. One of the central aims of torture is to reduce the individual to a position of extreme helplessness and distress that can lead to a deterioration of cognitive, emotional and behavioral functions. Thus, torture can be a means of attacking the individual’s fundamental modes of psychological and social functioning. …â€:
http://www.phrusa.org/research/istanbul_protocol/ispsych.html
— —
“Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentationof Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatmentor Punishment
(The Istanbul Protocol)
Submitted to the:
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
August 9, 1999 “:
http://www.phrusa.org/research/istanbul_protocol/
http://www.phrusa.org/research/istanbul_protocol/ist_prot.pdf
http://www.ohchr.org/english/about/publications/docs/8rev1.pdf
— —
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1841100684/102-1595635-8050521?v=glance&n=283155
— —-
“The Medical Documentation of Tortureâ€:
http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=1841100684
— —
“Founded in 1985, the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture provides care and rehabilitation to survivors of torture and other forms of organised violence. “:
http://www.torturecare.org.uk/
http://www.torturecare.org.uk/about/134
— —
“AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
(Adopted at the Inter-American Specialized Conference on Human Rights,
San Josй, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969)â€: …
“Article 5. Right to Humane Treatment
1. Every person has the right to have his physical, mental, and moral integrity respected.
2. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading punishment or treatment. All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.
3. Punishment shall not be extended to any person other than the criminal.
4. Accused persons shall, save in exceptional circumstances, be segregated from convicted persons, and shall be subject to separate treatment appropriate to their status as unconvicted persons.
5. Minors while subject to criminal proceedings shall be separated from adults and brought before specialized tribunals, as speedily as possible, so that they may be treated in accordance with their status as minors.
6. Punishments consisting of deprivation of liberty shall have as an essential aim the reform and social readaptation of the prisoners.â€:
…
“Article 6. Freedom from Slaveryâ€:
…
“Article 7. Right to Personal Libertyâ€:
…
“Article 11. Right to Privacyâ€:
… :
http://www.cidh.oas.org/Basicos/basic3.htm
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/oasinstr/zoas3con.htm
http://www.hrcr.org/docs/American_Convention/oashr.html
— —
“African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rightsâ€:
…
“ARTICLE 4
Human beings are inviolable. Every human being shall be entitled to respect for his life and the integrity of his person. No one may be arbitrarily deprived of this right.â€:
…
“ARTICLE 5
Every individual shall have the right to the respect of the dignity inherent in a human being and to the recognition of his legal status. All forms of exploitation and degradation of man, particularly slavery, slave trade, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and treatment shall be prohibited.â€
…
http://www.achpr.org/english/_info/charter_en.html
————- ————— —————
“The European Convention on Human Rights
ROME 4 November 1950â€: …
“ARTICLE 3
No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.â€:
http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html#C.Art3
— —
United Nations
General Assembly
29 November 1985
96th plenary meeting
A/RES/40/34 :
“ Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice
for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Powerâ€:
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/40/a40r034.htm
— —
United Nations
General Assembly
Distr.:General
22 February 2001
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly.
A/RES/55/89
55/89. Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. :
Principles on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Gruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
(4 December 2000) :
http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r55.htm
http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N00/564/73/PDF/N0056473.pdf?OpenElement
— —
“CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES†:
…
“ ARTICLE 10 – RIGHT TO LIFE
States Parties reaffirm that every human being has the inherent right to life and shall take all necessary measures to ensure its effective enjoyment by persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others.
…
ARTICLE 15 – FREEDOM FROM TORTURE OR CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT
1. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his or her free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
2. States Parties shall take all effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent persons with disabilities on an equal basis with others from being subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
…
ARTICLE 17 – PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PERSON
Every person with disabilities has a right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity on an equal basis with others. “
… :
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/ahc8adart.htm
— —
“General Assembly
GA/10554
Sixty-first General Assembly
Plenary
76th Meeting (AM)â€:
“GENERAL ASSEMBLY ADOPTS GROUNDBREAKING CONVENTION, OPTIONAL PROTOCOL ON RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIESâ€:
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/ga10554.doc.htm
— —
“CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES†:
“Resolution No.
A/RES/61/106â€:
http://www.un.org/Depts/dhl/resguide/r61.htm
“The Plenary of the General Assembly adopted the Convention on 13 December 2006â€:
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm
— —
“International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”:…
“Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected
without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.”:
http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm
— —
“Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishmentâ€:
“Article 2
1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.
2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.
3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture. “ …:
http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm
“Committee against Tortureâ€:
“Monitoring the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishmentâ€:
http://www.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/index.htm
…
Yours sincerely.
Seven Points in Sharon’s article are especially noteworthy.
1. Psychotronic weaponry enjoys ban-protection at high levels in the government.
“A proposal made in 2001 by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) to ban “psychotronic weapons” (another common term for mind-control technology) was hailed by TIs as a great step forward. But the bill was widely derided by bloggers and columnists and quickly dropped. The bill was later reintroduced, minus the mind control.”
2. Existence of voice-directing weaponry using invisible waves is confirmed.
“In 2002, the Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a technology: using microwaves to send words into someone’s head.”
3. The fact of government sponsored human experimentation is also confirmed.
“the patent was based on human experimentation in October 1994 at the Air Force lab scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects”
4. Work to improve the technology continues and is considered exceedingly sensitive.
“That work is exceedingly sensitive” and unlikely to be reported in any unclassified documents, he[Dennis Bushnell] says.
5. Weapons that use radiation to inflict pain are real.
“the military’s use of weapons that employ electromagnetic radiation to create pain is well-known”
6. Our country is not above testing weapons on innocent people.
“it’s reasonable to assume that if the defense establishment could develop mind-control or long-distance ray weapons, it almost certainly would. And, once developed, the possibility that they might be tested on innocent civilians could not be categorically dismissed.”
7. To military officials, war takes precedence over ethics and freedom of thought.
“In one hand is mind control and the sanctity of free thought — and in the other hand, a tad higher — is the war on terrorism.”
Is there no such thing as the truth of simple human conscience in this world?
STOP BIO-PSYCHOTRONIC WEAPONS TORTURE BRAINMIND CONTROL ASSASSINATION!!!
Dear Sir, Madam, :
“Washington Post Magazineâ€:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/NewsSearch?sb=-1&st=By%20Sharon%20Weinberger&
“Mind Gamesâ€
“By Sharon Weinberger
Sunday, January 14, 2007; W22â€:
Quote: “…In fact, the TI continued, “many report the sensation of having their genitalia manipulated.”
Both male and female TIs report a variety of “attacks” to their sexual organs. …â€:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/10/AR2007011001399_5.html
— —
Quote: “…, werd in het K.Z. Auschwitz ook onderzocht, hoe men door röntgenstralen vrouwen steriel kon maken. Hierover bericht Kleinova het volgende: “La méthode du Prof. Schumann consistait à faire d’abord une application de rayons X sur la partie inférieure de l’abdomen, c’est à dire sur les organes génitaux internes. Après quelquesunes de ces applications, une ovariectomie était pratiquée, tantôt bi-latérale, tantôt uni-latérale. Dans ce dernier cas, une nouvelle laparatomie enlevait le second ovaire quelque temps aprèsâ€.
Maar Prof. Schumann beperkte zich niet tot de vrouwen. Bij mannen werd het effect van röntgenstralen op een of twee testikels nagegaan door bestraling van het scrotum.Volgens Steinberg, die arts geweest is in Block 21 van het Stammlager Auschwitz, werden de mannen na de bestraling weer het kamp ingestuurd; zij waren “bis auf weiteres†van de selecties voor de gaskamer vrijgesteld. Na enige tijd werden zij ondervraagd op polluties, sexuele verlangens, karakterveranderingen, geheugenstoornissen, enz. Zij moesten masturberen en indien dit niet lukte, werd prostaatmassage toegepast, eerst digitaal, later “au moyen d’une manivelle qui était introduite dans le fondement du malheureux, quelques tours de manivelle suffisaient pour provoquer l’érection et l’éejaculation de liquide spermatiqueâ€. …â€:
ELIE ARON COHEN, HET DUITSE CONCENTRATIEKAMP, Een medische en psychologische studie, proefschrift, Uitgeverij H.J.Paris – Amsterdam MCMLII, pag.83.
http://antiqbook.nl/boox/his/000076.shtml
http://www.antiqbook.nl/boox/erwin/001378.shtml
http://www.antiqbook.com/books/bookinfo.phtml?o=his&bnr=000076
— —
“Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishmentâ€:
“Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 39/46
of 10 December 1984 “:
“Article 2
1. Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory under its jurisdiction.
2. No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political in stability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture.
3. An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be invoked as a justification of torture. “ …:
http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/cat.htm
P.S.:
Dutch to English
French to English
German to English
http://babelfish.altavista.com/
Yours sincerely.
The more things change…
James Tilly Matthews was making very similar claims about government agents and mind control engines in the late 18th/early 19th century:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Tilly_Matthews
http://www.nthposition.com/theairloomgangjames.php
I suggest that the micro bio-chip conspiracy goes alot farthur than even these articles and websites claim. It is a massive and elaborate subterranean structure that even includes the so-called Human Rights groups. Extra-judical settlements, hush money, cover-ups and confidentiality agreements appear to be the standard. These Human Rights groups make all the traditional sounds of moralistic outrage at these clandestine science activities and yet the brutality continues unabated. This secret industry is quite pathetic in form and structure. However two-faced and insincere it may seem it unfortuantely is all there is. The taking of strong, healthy People and ripping into their minds and bodies until they are reduced to a quivering psychotic mass of flesh and bone and calling it “science” is a thriving industry and possibly quite lucrative for parties on both sides of the issue.